DFS Issues Regs Barring Auto Insurers From Asking About Occupation, Education
Auto insurance companies in New York can no longer ask about education and occupation as factors for setting premiums, the state's Department of Financial Services said Wednesday.
December 13, 2017 at 02:40 PM
6 minute read
Maria Vullo of the New York State Department of Financial Services. Photo credit: Rick Kopstein.
Auto insurance companies in New York can no longer ask about education and occupation as factors for setting premiums, the state's Department of Financial Services said Wednesday.
Following a multiyear investigation, DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo issued regulations that are aimed at deterring discriminatory auto insurance rates. Under the new regulations, insurers are prohibited from asking an individual's occupation or educational level as a factor for setting rates, unless the insurer demonstrates that such questions don't result in rates that are “unfairly discriminatory.”
In a statement, Vullo said New York drivers who don't have college degrees or high-paying jobs shouldn't be penalized with higher auto insurance rates. The investigation by the department found that some insurance companies use an individual's education level to establish a tier placement “without a clear demonstration of the required relationship between these factors and driving ability.”
“As a result, classes of insureds have been placed in less favorably rated tiers, which may lead to higher premiums, without sufficient actuarial support that an individual's education level and/or occupational status related to his or her driving ability or habits in such a way that the insurer would have a different risk of loss,” DFS said in a news release.
Allstate and Liberty Mutual have already reached an agreement with DFS to comply with the new auto insurance regulations, the department said. Other insurers who had been using education level and occupation as a factor for rate setting will have 180 days to comply with the regulations and amend their programs.
The New York Insurance Association, a trade group that represents property and casualty insurers, said DFS is “traveling down a dangerous path by introducing subjectivity into insurance.”
“Insurance companies demonstrate great caution and objectivity in how insurance policies are written. The very nature of insurance is to use unbiased and proven actuarial standards and data to determine risk. Insurance companies, to ensure they are being objective, cannot look to nebulous terms such as reasonableness, intuition and satisfaction. Relying on subjectivity and limiting underwriting factors can penalize drivers and drive up the cost of insurance. Companies are only allowed to use factors that are predictive of loss,” said NYIA president Ellen Melchionni.
Melchionni added that an individual's education and occupation “have been mathematically proven to be correlated with risk.” Insurers use data, such as a person's driving record, the type of car they drive, gender and age as underwriting factors for policies.
Maria Vullo of the
Auto insurance companies in
Following a multiyear investigation, DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo issued regulations that are aimed at deterring discriminatory auto insurance rates. Under the new regulations, insurers are prohibited from asking an individual's occupation or educational level as a factor for setting rates, unless the insurer demonstrates that such questions don't result in rates that are “unfairly discriminatory.”
In a statement, Vullo said
“As a result, classes of insureds have been placed in less favorably rated tiers, which may lead to higher premiums, without sufficient actuarial support that an individual's education level and/or occupational status related to his or her driving ability or habits in such a way that the insurer would have a different risk of loss,” DFS said in a news release.
Allstate and
The
“Insurance companies demonstrate great caution and objectivity in how insurance policies are written. The very nature of insurance is to use unbiased and proven actuarial standards and data to determine risk. Insurance companies, to ensure they are being objective, cannot look to nebulous terms such as reasonableness, intuition and satisfaction. Relying on subjectivity and limiting underwriting factors can penalize drivers and drive up the cost of insurance. Companies are only allowed to use factors that are predictive of loss,” said NYIA president Ellen Melchionni.
Melchionni added that an individual's education and occupation “have been mathematically proven to be correlated with risk.” Insurers use data, such as a person's driving record, the type of car they drive, gender and age as underwriting factors for policies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250