Judge Sees Forum Shopping in Class Bid to Move Pollution Case
An effort by plaintiffs to move a class action suit over alleged contamination at a former defense plant in Nassau County from federal to state court indicates forum shopping, according to a judge's ruling.
December 19, 2017 at 07:57 PM
3 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Photo by Rick Kopstein
An effort by plaintiffs to move a class action suit over alleged contamination at a former defense plant in Nassau County from federal to state court indicates forum shopping, according to a judge's ruling.
The suit concerns the former site of Northrop Grumman's Grumman-Aerospace-Bethpage facility, which sat on 635 acres in Nassau County, and an 18-acre tract of land that the defense giant donated to the town of Oyster Bay that is now Bethpage Community Park.
Northrop and the Navy began operating manufacturing, research and testing facilities at the site in the late 1930s; concerns about pollution from the area began as early as the late 1940s when chromium was found in the groundwater in the area.
In 1983, it was added to the list of New York State's Superfund sites.
In a suit filed in 2016 in Nassau County Supreme Court, a class of plaintiffs alleges that Northrop Grumman left behind a combination of contaminants that include trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and other volatile organic compounds, as well as polychlorinated biphenyls, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury.
The contaminants combined into a massive, toxic underground plume that measures 4.5 miles long and 3.5 miles wide that has caused a public health scare on Long Island and prompted Gov. Andrew Cuomo to order Northrop Grumman to open its wells on the site to the state Department of Environmental Protection for testing.
Northrop Grumman successfully moved to transfer the lawsuit to federal court, arguing that the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) conferred jurisdiction to the federal courts and that there is complete diversity in the case as it is defined in 28 U.S.C. §1332.
After the case was moved to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the plaintiffs added Oyster Bay as a defendant in the case, alleging that it should be a party because it owns and operates the park at the site, and filed a motion to remand the case to state court, arguing that the case should fall under the CAFA's exception for local controversies.
But U.S. District Judge Denis Hurley of the Eastern District of New York said it appears that adding Oyster Bay as a defendant was done for the sole purpose of triggering the local controversies exception and gives rise to a “strong suggestion of forum shopping.”
Northrop Grumman is represented by Hollingsworth partners Frank Leone and Donald Fowler and Morrison & Foerster partners Grant Esposito and Jessica Kaufman. Members of the defense team did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In an interview, Paul Napoli of Napoli Shkolnik said that while the plaintiffs felt that a state court in Nassau County was the appropriate venue for the case, he said they were “certainly fine” with presenting their case before a federal judge.
“Having been a longtime Long Island resident, it's the secret that everyone knows about, that Bethpage and the site are a contaminated mess that is causing cancer and causing everyone suffering and loss of loved ones,” he said.
In addition to Napoli, the plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Shkolnik partner Hunter Shkolnik.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Trump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250