Driver's Account of Fatal 2011 Bus Crash Not Credible, Judge Rules in Civil Case
A bus driver involved in a gruesome 2011 crash that killed 15 people has been ruled not credible in the ensuing civil litigation.
December 21, 2017 at 06:56 PM
5 minute read
A bus driver involved in a gruesome 2011 crash on Interstate 95 in the Bronx that killed 15 people avoided a criminal conviction after arguing that a truck cut him off in traffic, but the judge in the ensuing civil litigation regarding the accident has ruled that the driver's version of events is not credible.
While the ruling by Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Karen Rothenberg to grant summary judgment to Webster Trucking Corp., which owns the tractor-trailer that bus driver Ophadell Williams, also a defendant in the case, says cut him off, casts doubts on Williams' credibility, the ruling is a blow to the plaintiffs in the case, as it significantly reduces the amount of money they could recover through insurance.
Webster Trucking has a $25 million insurance policy for the tractor-trailer that allegedly caused Williams to lose control of a bus owned by World Wide Tours, which has a $5 million policy.
David Kownacki, a Manhattan solo attorney serving as lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the consolidated civil case, said Rothenberg's ruling was “devastating” for the plaintiffs but said on Thursday that he and other plaintiffs counsel had yet to determine if they will appeal.
In the early morning hours of March 12, 2011, Williams was driving 32 passengers in a so-called Chinatown bus, discount intercity buses generally available in Chinatowns in East Coast cities that have raised safety concerns in the past, from the Mohegan Sun casino in Uncasville, Connecticut, to Manhattan's Chinatown.
As it passed through the Bronx, the bus struck a guardrail, overturned, then struck a signpost that ripped through the cabin of the bus.
Thirteen passengers died at the scene, two more died in hospitals and 17 were injured, including a man represented by Kownacki whose arms were ripped off when he tried to protect his head.
The Bronx District Attorney's Office went after Williams, bringing 54 charges that included manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and assault.
While Williams' lawyer argued that Webster Trucking's tractor-trailer was to blame for the crash, prosecutors argued that Williams was too sleep-deprived to be behind the wheel, a condition that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says was responsible for 846 traffic deaths in 2014.
For prosecutors, “drowsy driving” is harder to prove than cases in which drivers are accused of being impaired by alcohol or narcotics or distracted by their mobile devices, and the challenge of doing so in Williams' case proved to be too much for the Bronx DA: in 2012, a Bronx jury acquitted Williams of all but one charge, a misdemeanor related to his failure to pay numerous tickets.
Meanwhile, the estates of the 15 passengers killed in the crash and the injured passengers filed suit in several counties related to the crash, and the New York Litigation Coordinating Panel ordered that all claims rising from the crash be consolidated in Brooklyn Supreme Court.
In the civil litigation, the plaintiffs, World Wide Tours and Williams have depended on Williams' account of how the accident occurred, but Webster Trucking and Joshua Alphonso Reid, the tractor-trailer driver alleged to have caused the accident, submitted what they deemed a “mountain of evidence” to refute Williams' story.
Specifically, Webster and Reid submitted expert testimony from Ashley Dunn, an accident reconstruction expert, who said that Williams did not apply his brakes before the collision and that the tire marks the bus left on the roadway were more consistent with the driver nodding off at the wheel than the driver turning sharply to avoid another vehicle.
Additionally, Dunn said, the event data recorder on the bus indicated that the vehicle was traveling slightly faster than the tractor-trailer in roughly 100 seconds before the crash, which would have made it physically impossible for the bus to have been cut off by the truck.
Webster and Reid also submitted reports from the New York State Police and other motorists driving near the scene of the accident indicating that it was a one-vehicle crash.
And Williams himself gave conflicting accounts of the crash, Webster and Reid argue: he told both the state police and the National Transportation Safety Board that Reid's truck came in contact with the bus just before the accident, but Williams has said in depositions in the related civil cases that the two vehicles didn't touch.
In an order issued on Wednesday to grant summary judgment dismissing Webster and Reid from the case, Rothenberg said that Williams' testimony is not credible as a matter of law, noting the inconsistencies between the account he gave to police following the crash and what he said during deposition testimony and that his story isn't corroborated by witnesses.
Timothy Capowski, a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, represents Webster and Reid.
James Burke, a partner at Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, represents Williams and the bus company. He said he disagrees with portions of Rothenberg's decision and says Williams' story has remained consistent throughout the case.
“Mr. Williams has consistently claimed from the moment that the accident occurred that he was cut off,” Burke said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readDecision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250