Jury Finds Former Martin Shkreli Attorney Guilty in Stock Scheme
Evan Greebel, a former partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman who was at Kaye Scholer at the time of his arrest, was stone faced as a jury handed up guilty verdicts for one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud.
December 27, 2017 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
|
Evan Greebel, Martin Shkreli's former attorney and co-defendant in a case alleging the two took part in a securities fraud scheme, was found guilty Wednesday of two counts related to his role.
Greebel, a former partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman and Kaye Scholer, was stone faced as U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District of New York read aloud guilty verdicts for one count each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud.
Members of Greebel's legal team, which mounted a defense that included a roughly nine-hour summation that spanned two days, appeared shocked by the verdict as Greebel's wife wept in the courtroom.
Acting U.S. Attorney Bridget Rohde appeared in the courtroom for the verdict.
The jury handed up the verdict after it briefly held deliberations on Friday afternoon and again Tuesday. No date is set for sentencing, but Greebel faces a maximum of 20 years in prison.
The verdict comes several months after another federal jury in Brooklyn found Shkreli, a former pharmaceutical executive who rose to fame after he increased the price of a drug for people diagnosed with HIV and AIDS from $13.50 a pill to $750 a pill, guilty of three of eight counts related to the scheme. Shkreli was convicted of two counts of securities fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in August.
Greebel was accused of working with Shkreli, the former CEO of Retrophin, in what prosecutors called an elaborate Ponzi scheme. Shkreli was convicted of using Retrophin's assets to pay back investors in two hedge funds he created—the now-defunct MSMB Capital Management and MSMB Healthcare Management—through the use of sham settlements and consulting agreements.
Greebel, 44, who worked as outside counsel to Retrophin from 2012 to 2014, was accused of drafting the phony documents as well as fraudulently backdating agreements.
Shkreli's sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 21. He spent more than a month as a free man following his conviction but, in September, Matsumoto revoked his bail after he posted a $5,000 bounty for a lock of Hillary Clinton's hair on his Facebook page.
Greebel's trial did not attract the level of publicity that surrounded Shkreli's six-week trial, owing presumably to the fact that Shkreli has maintained a public persona as something of a millennial villain while Greebel has maintained a relatively low profile. Shkreli did play a key role in Greebel's proceedings.
Greebel's attorneys worked to downplay his association with Shkreli, saying the government was trying to find their client “guilty by representation,” and painted Greebel as a victim of Shkreli, rather than an accomplice.
But Assistant U.S. Attorney Alixandra Smith, who also appeared for the government during Shkreli's trial, argued Greebel saw Shkreli as a “meal ticket,” and that he made $900,000 working with Shkreli and Retrophin—triple what Katten was paying him at the time.
In a statement, Rohde said Greebel “exploited his knowledge of the law in his efforts to break the law” and that he “betrayed the trust” of Retrophin board members to represent the company's best interests.
In addition to Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorneys David Pitluck and David Kessler also appeared for the government.
Unlike the jury in Shkreli's trial, jurors in Greebel's case felt there was enough evidence presented to find the attorney guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Shkreli was acquitted of his single count of wire fraud conspiracy, which Benjamin Brafman, lead counsel on Shkreli's defense team, called the “heart” of the government's case against his client.
Speaking with reporters after the verdict Wednesday, Reed Brodsky, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, said that, with regard to his client's past relationship with Shkreli, it is difficult to “get justice when there is an association with someone this toxic.”
“This is a case where we believe and hope that the judge will evaluate the evidence and the law and right this injustice,” Brodsky said.
Greebel's defense team also included Gibson Dunn partner Randy Mastro and Joshua Dubin, a Florida-based solo attorney.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 2Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 3Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 4Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 5Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250