Alan Scheinkman's Rise to Presiding Justice of Appellate Division, Second Department
When Gov. Andrew Cuomo appointed Alan Scheinkman as the presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department, on New Year's Day, the governor was bucking tradition. It's rare for the presiding justice to come from outside the appellate court.
January 08, 2018 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
When Gov. Andrew Cuomo appointed Alan Scheinkman as the presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department, on New Year's Day, the governor was bucking tradition. It's rare for the presiding justice to come from outside the appellate court.
But in a series of interviews since his selection, those who have worked with Scheinkman said they are sure he is ready for the challenge; they cited his administrative abilities, attention to detail, understanding of commercial law and judicial temperament. He will be replacing Randall Eng, who reached the mandatory retirement age in 2017.
At the same time as appointing Scheinkman, the governor selected Elizabeth Garry to become presiding justice of the Third Department. Garry, the first openly LGBTQ presiding justice in the state, takes over for Karen Peters, the first female presiding justice, who reached the mandatory retirement age in 2017.
Robert Haig, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren who sits on the Commercial Division Advisory Council with Scheinkman, praised his ability to handle difficult and involved business matters.
“He has played a key role in the Commercial Division's efforts to transform business litigation in New York state and to make New York a preferred venue for complex business disputes,” Haig said.
“He's very smart and also very practical. He has a knack for getting to the heart of an issue. At the same time, he encourages a high level of dialogue and exchange with counsel on difficult legal issues,” said Mark Zauderer, a partner at Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer.
Scheinkman's experience has been as a state Supreme Court justice and administrative judge. In addition to commercial matters, he has handled residential mortgage foreclosures and matrimonial trials. He also has served as an associate judge on the Appellate Term for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial districts and as Westchester County attorney.
Richard Edlin, vice chair of Greenberg Traurig, said he tried a very complicated case in front of Scheinkman.
“He has a wonderful judicial temperament. He's fair to the lawyers. He hears them out. He's firm but efficient,” he said. “I thought he was an outstanding trial judge and at the end of the day, the Appellate Division, because of its broad mandate, deals with a lot of trial-related issues. I think that his really extensive experience in complex trials will be something that will be really valuable in this court.”
Lawrence Marks, chief administrative judge of the state court system, praised Scheinkman's managerial skills.
“Justice Scheinkman has been a highly successful administrative judge,” Marks said. “Under the excellence initiative program, his judicial district has been a leader in the state in addressing case backlogs and delays. That experience will serve him well in heading up our largest appellate department.”
Scott Mollen, a partner at Herrick Feinstein, noted that Scheinkman is an authority on the appellate court's operation.
“He co-authored with professor David Siegel the second and third editions of the New York State Bar Association's practitioner's handbook to practice at the appellate level. I mention that particularly because he's not coming from the Appellate Division directly,” he said. “He also played a key role in helping modernize and expand court facilities, which is important not only to people within the court system but to the public at large.”
When Scheinkman was asked his opinion on why the governor's office chose him, he said he doesn't know for sure but believes it was because of his administrative skills. ”What I'd like to think is I offer a proven record of managerial experience.”
Scheinkman said that despite his elevated position he will remain as chair of a task force that is studying changes to the state constitution. Chief Judge Janet DiFiore has asked the panel to suggest ways to make the court system more efficient.
As the new presiding justice, he will definitely gain first-hand knowledge of at least one proposal before the task force: splitting up the Second Department, the largest appellate court in the country.
While Scheinkman would not elaborate on task force discussions, he made clear that nothing has been ruled out. “What I can say is that the charge to the task force from Judge DiFiore remains unchanged, which is to look at all possible constitutional amendments.”
Scheinkman is as enthusiastic about joining the court as his admirers are about his selection.
“I've always been impressed with the quality of the judges and their diligence and hard work and I look forward to working with these judges who have earned my respect and have earned the respect of the entire bar,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readLegal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 2New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 3Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 4Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 5Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250