Louis Vuitton Ends Copyright Losing Streak, Beats Back Attorney Fees
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman didn't find the joke funny enough to grant attorney fees and costs to a company that prevailed against fashion icon Louis Vuitton's copyright infringement suit on parody grounds.
January 09, 2018 at 04:51 PM
3 minute read
Apparently, the joke wasn't that funny. At least not enough for U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York to grant attorney fees and costs to a company that prevailed against fashion icon Louis Vuitton's copyright infringement suit on parody grounds.
My Other Bag, as its name suggests, created a line of products using the popular “My other car is a …” bumper-sticker refrain to parody the upscale fashion brand. The unamused Louis Vuitton sued the bag pranksters for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and copyright infringement.
In 2016, Furman granted summary judgment in favor of My Other Bag, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the decision, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied Louis Vuitton's petition for a writ of certiorari.
Furman said My Other Bag did not avail in its motion for attorney fees and costs under the Lanham Act and Copyright Act. There was no “reason to pile on further” by awarding attorney fees and costs to My Other Bag's counsel, “however sympathetic its cause may be,” Furman wrote.
The judge's decision rebutting My Other Bag's Lanham Act claims turned largely on the application of the Supreme Court's 2014 decision in Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness. In that case, the high court ruled on “parallel language” found in the U.S. Patent Act that “exceptional cases” threshold for the awarding of attorney fees to prevailing parties in copyright cases was crossed when the filing of the suit was unreasonable.
Furman said, despite Louis Vuitton's defeat, the same logic in Octane Fitness should apply here, where the fashion company's actions were born out of reasonable concerns, if aggressively pursued.
Of potential interest going forward is the fact, noted by Furman, that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has not dealt with the potential conflict of Octane Fitness on its own circuit precedent, “opting on two occasions to defer it to another day.” An appeal in the suit would give the appellate court the chance to take the issue on directly.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Howard Hogan led Louis Vuitton's legal action in this matter. He declined to comment on the decision.
Miller Korzenik Sommers name attorney David Korzenik led the latest leg of litigation for My Other Bag. He told the New York Law Journal the case was being reviewed, but an appeal was likely in the offing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trade Fixtures in New York Eminent Domain Cases—What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readAttorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 2New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 3Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 4Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 5Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250