Housing Court Judge Marked for Removal Fighting to Stay on Job
A controversial New York City Housing Court judge—who an advisory council recommended for removal from the bench amidst a raft of complaints against her—wants to be reappointed to her seat.
January 10, 2018 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
Judge Susan Avery.
A controversial New York City Housing Court judge—who an advisory council recommended for removal from the bench amidst a raft of complaints against her—wants to be reappointed to her seat.
The complaints, which were described in a confidential letter that was leaked to the New York Post, led to the recommendation of the Advisory Council for the Housing Part for the ouster of Judge Susan Avery.
Avery, a 2012 appointee to the bench on the city's Housing Court who presided over a housing part in Brooklyn and now sits in Manhattan, was criticized for lengthy delays in proceedings before her and conflicts of interest regarding her family's real estate holdings.
Also among the concerns about Avery's conduct, according to a copy of a confidential letter from the advisory council that was read to the Post, included a 2013 incident in which she chided a lawyer with cerebral palsy for having bad handwriting.
Barry Kamins, a partner at Aidala Bertuna & Kamins and a retired state Supreme Court justice who is representing Avery in the matter, said Avery is applying for reappointment to her seat because her five-year term ended, but declined to comment further.
Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks is set to make the final decision of whether or not Avery will be reappointed to the bench, Kamins said.
According to the Post's report, as well as Housing Court practitioners with knowledge of Avery's courtroom conduct who declined to be named, there have been complaints about excessive delays in cases before Avery in which tenants have been left without heat or hot water.
The 14-member advisory council is made up of representatives from the real estate industry, civic groups and bar associations. Members who were reached by the Law Journal declined to comment.
The leak of a confidential letter to the Post concerning a Housing Court judge has raised the ire of the Housing Court Judges Association.
In a letter to Marks, Housing Court Judge Timmie Erin Elsner, president of the association, said the Post article raised “serious issues” regarding the integrity of the advisory council and requesting that the Office of Court Administration review the procedures in place for keeping the advisory council's findings confidential, but did not name Avery specifically.
“The information in the document was not intended for dissemination to the public,” Elsner wrote. “Its circulation, prior to a final determination regarding her future as a housing judge, is damaging on many levels.”
OCA spokesman Lucian Chalfen said that court officials intend to address concerns about the leak in the letter that will be sent to the advisory council in the coming days.
“Hopefully there will be no recurrence,” Chalfen said.
Gail Prudenti, who served as chief administrative judge for the court system at the time of Avery's appointment and who is now dean of the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, said she does not recall appointing Avery specifically or any issues arising from the appointment.
In 2016, Avery ran for a seat on the bench in Manhattan Civil Court, but lost to Sabrina Kraus in the Democratic primary, who earned 55 percent of the vote and ran unopposed in the general election.
During the run-up to the 2016 primary elections for Civil Court, the New York City Bar Association gave Avery a “not approved” rating, however the city bar does not publicly issue its reasoning behind ratings for political candidates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250