NY Judge Opens Door to Pesticide-Injury Suit Filed Out-of-State
A federal judge in Manhattan has ruled that personal injury claims by a group of Central and South Americans who say they were sickened by pesticides used at banana plantations decades ago but who were absent from a similar case filed in 1993 were not barred by New York's statute of limitations.
January 11, 2018 at 06:13 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge in Manhattan has ruled that personal injury claims by a group of Central and South Americans who say they were sickened by pesticides used at banana plantations decades ago but who were absent from a similar case filed in 1993 were not barred by New York's statute of limitations.
U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York ruled that the statute of limitations clock was stopped in New York from 1993 to 2010 for claims brought in 2011 by plaintiffs from Costa Rica, Ecuador and Panama who say they were injured by the pesticide dibromochloropropane, or DBCP.
By ruling in the case, Engelmayer waded into a split among Southern District judges as to whether or not New York law allows “cross-jurisdictional class action tolling,” or pausing on New York's three-year statute of limitations for class members while a class action is pending in another state.
The class in Chavez v. Occidental, 17-cv-3459, is made up of more than 250 Central Americans who lived or worked on banana plantations from the 1960s to the early 1980s where DBCP was used.
DBCP is known to cause cancer, sexual and reproductive abnormalities and infertility. The plaintiffs say they were never warned of the dangers of DBCP and thus did not wear protective equipment.
Their claims are similar to those brought in long-running DBCP litigation first filed in 1993 in Texas against Occidental Chemical Co. and other firms.
For roughly the next few decades, the litigation ran along what Engelmayer called a “long train of procedural misadventures,” winding through courts in Hawaii and Costa Rica and ending up back in Texas state court in 2010, when the plaintiffs took a voluntary dismissal after failing to win class certification.
In 2011, a group of plaintiffs with similar claims but who were absent from the original DBCP suit filed a complaint in Louisiana that also cut a circuitous route through courts across the country. In 2012, the same plaintiffs also brought claims in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, which dismissed them under the filed-first rule because of the filing in Louisiana; a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia affirmed the ruling.
But in 2016, the full Third Circuit reconsidered the matter and ruled en banc to revive the claims. Last year, the case landed in the Southern District.
Moving to dismiss the claims as time-barred, Occidental argues that New York state courts have yet to wrestle with the issue of cross-jurisdictional tolling and, if that were to happen, it is likely that the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, would not allow it.
Southern District Judges Vincent Briccetti and Naomi Reice Buchwald have said in unrelated cases that they predict the Court of Appeals would accept such tolling, Engelmayer wrote, but that Southern District Judges Shira Scheindlin, who retired in 2016, and Robert Sweet declined to accept tolling.
Siding with Bricetti and Buchwald on the issue, Engelmayer waved off Occidental's argument that cross-jurisdictional tolling would open the litigation floodgates in New York and noted that the state has a “borrowing statute” in which a suit can't be filed if the clock ran out in another state, thus preventing the filing of “placeholder” suits.
“It was reasonable for these plaintiffs to stay their hands and hold off initiating individual actions against each particular manufacturer, whether in New York and/or the other states in which the entities are based,” the judge said.
Engelmayer certified his order for interlocutory appeal, saying that certification for the Court of Appeals may be appropriate in the case, as it is a “pure question” of New York law that has yet to be addressed by the state courts or by the Second Circuit in Manhattan.
The plaintiffs' legal team includes Scott Hendler and Rebecca Webber of Austin, Texas-based Hendler Lyons Flores; Jonathan Massey of Massey & Gail in Washington, D.C.; and Barbara Stratton of Knepper & Stratton in Wilmington, Delaware.
Hendler said in an interview that tolling the statute of limitations in one state for claims brought in another helps to effectuate the policy behind class action suits to avoid duplicate filings for plaintiffs seeking to enforce their rights.
“It's just not a well-reasoned view to say that a class action in one state doesn't toll the statute of limitations in other states,” Hendler said.
Occidental's defense team includes Donald Ferguson McNeil III and Conor McEvily in Vinson & Elkins' Houston-based office; Devon Holstad from the firm's New York office; and Timothy Houseal and Jennifer Kinkus of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor in Wilmington, Delaware.
McNeil declined to comment on the ruling and on whether or not Occidental plans to appeal the decision.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250