What the New Tax Law Means for Trusts and Estates
Tax Tips columnist Sidney Kess writes: For estates and trusts and their fiduciary returns, some things are clear: tax rates are different and there are many changes to understand. And many rules, such as the 3.8 percent net investment income tax on estates and trusts, have not changed. However, there are other matters that await IRS guidance.
January 12, 2018 at 02:45 PM
7 minute read
Trusts (other than grantor trusts), decedent's estates, and bankruptcy estates must file an annual income tax return, Form 1041, to report their income and expenses. They are primarily pass-through entities where beneficiaries report their share of items on their personal returns. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L 115-97) made many significant changes impacted these entities and their beneficiaries.
Tax Rates
There have been dramatic changes to the tax brackets for estate and trusts, which apply to income that is not distributed to beneficiaries. Instead of the former seven brackets, starting in 2018 there are only four brackets. Taxable income up to $2,550 is taxed at 10 percent. Taxable income over this amount but not over $9,150 is taxed at 24 percent. Taxable income over $9,150 but not over $12,500 is taxed at 35 percent. And taxable income over $12,500 is taxed at 37 percent (down from the 39.6 percent rate that applies in 2017).
After 2018, these brackets will be indexed for inflation, using the new inflation adjustment under the C-CPI-U. This new benchmark is likely to result in smaller increases. These brackets are set to sunset after 2025.
It is noteworthy that the tax brackets for estates and trusts are the same that will be used to figure the kiddie tax on unearned income for 2018 through 2025 (there is no change in the definition of children subject to this tax computation). Previously, the parent's top tax bracket was used for this purpose. Until now, because the kiddie tax was lower than the tax on fiduciary income, there was a tax savings to distributing trust income to a minor child. But with the kiddie tax in parity with the tax on fiduciary income, trustees may want to split the income between the minor child and the trust.
Exemptions
An estate is allowed a deduction of $600. A trust is allowed a deduction of $100; $300 if it is required to distribute all its income currently. These exemption amounts have not been changed under the new law. They are not adjusted annually for inflation.
Because of the elimination of the personal and dependency exemptions for individuals for 2018 through 2025, the exemption amount for a disability trust which is tied to these exemptions has been changed for this period (Code §642(b)(2)(C)). For these years, $4,150 is substituted for the exemption amount. This dollar amount will be adjusted for inflation after 2018.
Expenses That Are and Are Not Deductible
The new law eliminated some deductions that have previously been allowed, such as investment management fees and personal casualty or theft losses not resulting from a Presidentially-declared disaster. Fiduciaries now may prefer accounts that charge commissions for transactions, where such costs are deducted from sales proceeds when securities are sold, instead of using managed accounts, where fees are no longer deductible.
However, some expenses remain deductible:
• Amortized bond premiums and original issue discount (OID)
• Charitable distributions under the terms of a will, trust, or other governing instruction
• Depreciation and depletion
• Disaster losses in Presidentially-designated areas
• Federal estate tax on income in respect of a decedent (Code §691(c)).
• Interest expense under existing rules
• Net operating losses from a business (under new carryforward rules)
• State and local taxes on entity-owned businesses
The new 20 percent deduction for pass-through entities applies to trusts and estates (Code §199A). In computing the deduction, W-2 wages and the unadjusted basis of qualified property must be allocated between fiduciaries and beneficiaries to determine the W-2 and capital limitations (Code §199A(f)(1)(B)).
Deductions for Fiduciary Fees and Certain Other Costs
For 2017 returns, fiduciary fees are taken into account in figuring fiduciary income and are deductible on Form 1041. Starting in 2018, it is not entirely clear how the new law impacts the deduction for fiduciary fees and certain other costs. The new law bars an individual from deducting miscellaneous itemized deductions for 2018 through 2025 (Code §67(g)); this applies to fiduciaries as well. Essentially this refers to itemized deductions subject to the 2 percent-of-adjusted gross income floor. Until now there has been an exception to the bar on miscellaneous itemized deductions for costs that would not have been incurred if property were not held in a trust or estate (Code §67(e)). These non-2 percent items have included fiduciary fees and the domestic production activities deduction (which has been repealed by the new law).
Whether this exception continues to apply under the new law is not certain. If the exception does apply, then fiduciary fees and these other costs would still be deductible.
Another uncertainty is whether the $10,000 limit on the deduction for state and local taxes that applies to individuals starting in 2018 also applies to fiduciary returns. It may be that the exception to the cap for personal and real property taxes incurred for the production of income under Code §212 would permit a deduction for all such taxes where, for example, all of a trust's activities are managing investments held for the production of income.
IRS guidance on these unclear matters is essential. The determination of whether fiduciary fees are deductible will affect the amount of taxable income reported to beneficiaries on their Schedules K-1.
Other Matters
There are two changes impacting electing small business trusts (ESBTs). First, such trust can now have a nonresident alien beneficiary; this will not prevent the trust from being a permitted shareholder of an S corporation. Second, the computation of the charitable contribution deduction for electing small business trusts is changed after 2017 (Code §641(c)(2)(E)). The contribution deduction is determined by rules generally applicable to individuals, rather than rules applicable to trusts. The adjusted gross income (AGI) limitation is figured in the same way as in the case of an individual, except that deductions for costs paid in connection with the administration of the trust and which would not have been incurred if the property were not held in the trust are allowable in arriving at AGI.
The alternative minimum tax, which has been repealed for C corporations, continues to apply to estates and trusts. The exemption amount, which has been increased substantially for individuals in 2018 through 2025, has not been changed for estates and trusts. For 2018 the AMT exemption amount for estates and trusts is $24,600. This amount can be adjusted annually for inflation.
Conclusion
For estates and trusts and their fiduciary returns, some things are clear: tax rates are different and there are many changes to understand. And many rules, such as the 3.8 percent net investment income tax on estates and trusts, have not changed. However, there are other matters that await IRS guidance.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250