HSBC Agrees to $101M Penalty to Settle FX 'Front Running' Investigation
Documents released Thursday show the bank's foreign exchange traders made "front running" trades ahead of transactions for clients who hired the bank to handle currency conversions.
January 18, 2018 at 05:30 PM
3 minute read
HSBC entered into a nonprosecution agreement with the Justice Department and agreed to a $101 million penalty to settle an investigation into whether it used confidential information to manipulate currencies ahead of transactions on behalf of the bank's clients, according to documents made public Thursday.
The agreement, posted to the docket of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York late Thursday, shows the deal is related to previous actions against the former head of the bank's global foreign exchange cash trading, Mark Johnson. Johnson was convicted in October of numerous wire fraud counts in the Eastern District.
Thursday's revelations show Johnson's actions connected directly to HSBC itself, while detailing another scheme that prosecutors said showed the bank profited handsomely from the front-running trading practice.
In the documents released Thursday, prosecutors detailed the scheme Johnson was convicted of. At the center of it was HSBC's handling of a currency exchange transaction for Cairn Energy from the $3.5 billion sale of an Indian subsidiary. In October 2011, HSBC won the contract to handle the transaction, promising not to take any actions based on the confidential information about the transaction to convert dollars to pounds.
Ahead of the actual transaction, HSBC employees, including Johnson, openly discussed “ramping up” the currency market in a way that wouldn't make Cairn suspicious. Traders at the bank began buying up British pounds in anticipation of the transaction. When the actual transaction occurred in December, Johnson and others orchestrated front-running purchases of the currency ahead of the announcement.
All told, HSBC generated some $8 million in profits from the front-running scheme. Before and after the transaction, Johnson and others at HSBC continually provided Cairn with misleading information in an attempt to hide their fraudulent actions.
HSBC was represented by Davis Polk & Wardwell.
In a separate scheme detailed in the court documents, an unnamed company was likewise the victim of front-running. In February 2010, HSBC traders again used confidential information to make $34.8 million for the bank.
Prosecutors charged the bank with two counts of wire fraud. HSBC entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement and accepted responsibility for its actions. The bank agreed to pay a $101.5 million penalty, including a $63.1 million fine and $38.4 million in restitution. The payment reflected a 15 percent reduction in recognition of HSBC's cooperation and remediation, according to the bank.
“HSBC is committed to ensuring fair outcomes for our customers and protecting the orderly and transparent operation of the markets,” a spokesman for the bank said in a statement. “Since the historical conduct described in the agreement, we have strengthened our controls in the global markets business, and we will continue to make further improvements.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250