Sponsor of 'Lavern's Law' Medical Malpractice Bill Pessimistic About Its Chances
State Sen. John DeFrancisco, R-Syracuse, told the New York Law Journal on Wednesday afternoon that negotiations on a bill that would extend the time misdiagnosed cancer patients have to sue doctors and hospitals for the error have not been progressing with Gov. Andrew Cuomo's office.
January 18, 2018 at 06:29 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Photo by Rick Kopstein
ALBANY — The prime sponsor of legislation that would extend the amount of time in which a patient can file a medical malpractice lawsuit for a missed cancer diagnosis isn't optimistic about the bill becoming law.
State Sen. John DeFrancisco, R-Syracuse, told the New York Law Journal on Wednesday afternoon that negotiations with Gov. Andrew Cuomo's office on Lavern's Law have stalled.
“The governor has been pushing back on the law, wanting to make further changes. I think he's concerned with the hospitals' concerns,” said DeFrancisco, the deputy majority leader of the state Senate.
The bill—named after 41-year-old Lavern Wilkinson of the Bronx, who died in 2013—would extend the amount of time a patient has to bring a malpractice lawsuit against a physician or hospital over a missed cancer diagnosis. The bill, which was approved by lawmakers during the last few days of the legislative session in June 2017, would start the clock on when patients can bring medical malpractice cases involving cancers or malignant tumors from when the error is discovered by the patient, instead of when the misdiagnosis occurred, as is specified by current state law.
Cuomo has until the end of the month to make a decision on the legislation, which has received the support of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, a quiet but influential group in the Capitol. The legislation has pitted some of the Capitol's largest and most influential groups against each other, including the Trial Lawyers Association and hospital trade groups such as the Greater New York Hospital Association and the Healthcare Association of New York State.
The governor's office did not respond to a request for comment. The Trial Lawyers Association and the Healthcare Association of New York State also declined to comment.
Physicians, hospitals and malpractice insurers have argued that the legislation could open up a Pandora's box of lawsuits that could end up costing hospitals millions of dollars.
But DeFrancisco disputed that argument. “I've heard that rationale so many different times. It's a minuscule number of cases but it's a matter of fundamental fairness,” said DeFrancisco, who was formerly of counsel at Syracuse-based personal injury firm DeFrancisco & Falgiatano.
“So, [Cuomo] keeps pushing back and I can't see how he could keep doing that when he claims he's in support of the bill. If he wants to torpedo it in this fashion, then it's going to be, I think, a very big injustice if he doesn't sign this bill,” he said.
According to sources involved in negotiating the bill, but not authorized to publicly speak, conversations are ongoing. A source close to the legislative negotiations said the governor's office and Trial Lawyers Association are “engaged in good-faith discussions.”
Still, there's a possibility that the governor will sign the bill if chapter amendments that close certain loopholes in the legislation could be added, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The bill would allow patients to sue for misdiagnosis going back seven years, which has worried hospitals and malpractice insurers because they have not set up a reserve fund for potential claims. The legislation's language also doesn't ensure that the misdiagnosis only involves cancer, proponents argued.
Wilkinson, for whom the legislation is named, died in 2013 from a “treatable form of lung cancer.” Her doctors failed to tell her that a chest X-ray taken in 2010 showed a suspicious, two centimeter mass on her right lung, according to the New York Daily News, which has written numerous editorials urging passage of the legislation. In May 2012, Wilkinson returned to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn with a chronic cough. A chest X-ray found that the cancer had spread throughout her body. By the time Wilkinson learned of the doctors' error in 2012, the statute of limitation for her to file a lawsuit had expired.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250