Leon Lazer, NY Jurist, Scholar and Legal Influencer, Dies at 96
Lazer's influence on New York law and courts is still in evidence today.
January 22, 2018 at 04:37 PM
4 minute read
Leon Lazer.
Leon Lazer, a former justice on the Appellate Division, Second Department, and a longtime professor at Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, died Wednesday. He was 96.
Lazer, who had prostate cancer and other ailments over the years, died from natural causes, said his son, David Lazer, a founding partner of Melville-based Lazer Aptheker Rosella & Yedid.
After being elected as a Suffolk County Supreme Court justice in 1972, Lazer served about 14 years on the bench, including eight on the Appellate Division. He authored close to 150 published opinions, including several notable decisions, such as in People v. Suitte, dealing with sentencing, and Nicastro v. Park, related to deference to trial judges by appellate courts.
Lazer, a veteran of World War II who fought in the Battle of the Bulge, was repeatedly nominated to serve on the state's highest court. ”His four nominations to the Court of Appeals are a clear testament to the impeccable reputation he enjoyed during his unparalleled 70-year legal career,” said Gail Prudenti, former chief administrative judge for the court system and now dean at Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. Lazer “was widely respected for his keen intellect and wise judgment,” she said.
His influence on New York law and courts can be seen today.
For more than 30 years, Lazer was chair of the Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions of the Association of Supreme Court Justices of the State of New York. The committee, a group of 15 judges in the state, produces a four-volume set of model jury charges for use by judges in civil trials.
After he left the bench, Lazer helped form the Office of the Appellate Defender to serve indigent criminal defendants. He was the original chair of the organization for three years and then was a member of its board, according to biographical details provided by Touro.
David Lazer said his father's leadership and participation in various legal groups and efforts over the years helped him stay involved in the law after he left the bench in 1987.
“He was a giant intellectual, and he loved the law and anything to do with the law,” he said. “That's why he had his fingers in all these different things, and that's what motivated and moved him and satisfied his intellect.”
After leaving the bench, Lazer practiced law for about four years at now-defunct firm Shea & Gould in Manhattan, David Lazer said. And for the last 25 years of his life, Lazer was of counsel as his son's firm, Lazer Aptheker. For roughly the same period, he taught torts and land use at Touro Law Center. He helped attract scholars across the country for the school's annual Leon D. Lazer Supreme Court Review.
“He was always doing something, because it was intellectually challenging and stimulating for him to be involved in that,” David Lazer said. “That's why he was a professor well into his 90s.”
Touro Law Dean Harry Ballan said Lazer was a “perfectionist, he was very exacting and at the same time, compassionate. ”
“He was a person of such wide learning,” Ballan said, adding that Lazer could talk as much about history or other subjects as the law. Teaching “was as natural to him as breathing.”
Previously, Lazer was town attorney in Huntington, and he was a part of a committee that helped create the concept of the Suffolk County Legislature, David Lazer said.
Before graduating from New York University School of Law in 1948, Lazer served three-and-a-half years in the U.S. Army, serving in Europe, David Lazer said.
He was preceded in death by his wife, Renee Lazer. He is survived by two children, David and Deborah Lazer; two grandchildren; and his sister, Dolores Silver, among other family members.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe 'Go-To' Jurist for Guidance: John Keenan, Senior Judge in Manhattan U.S. Federal Court, Has Died
State's Prosecutors Mourns Death of Former Hudson Valley Prosecutor
Chester Straub, Retired Federal Appeals Judge and Politician, Dies at 87
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250