SEC Says Former KPMG Employees Used Leaked Inspection Info to Dodge Audit Review Problems
According to the SEC, former inspectors from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board used information about upcoming audit reviews to scrub their work on behalf of KPMG clients.
January 22, 2018 at 05:54 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission building in Washington, D.C.
Former accountants at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and former senior officials at accounting firm KPMG face civil and criminal charges over an alleged scheme to use leaked information about upcoming inspections of KPMG's audits.
The information was allegedly used by former KPMG officials to re-examine their work to avoid potentially negative findings by the oversight board. In a statement, Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Jay Clayton called the alleged conduct disturbing, going to the heart of the commission's disclosure-based regulatory regime.
“A company's financial statements provide investors with a wealth of material information, and independent audits give investors confidence that those statements can be trusted,” Clayton said. “The PCAOB is a critical part of the oversight of our local, national, and international capital markets, in that it helps to promote high-quality audits of the financial statements of issuers and broker-dealers, upon which investors rely.”
According to regulators, Brian Sweet left a supervisory position at the PCAOB to join KPMG at a time when the accounting firm was experiencing a high rate of deficiencies. In 2013 alone, nearly half of KPMG's audits were found deficient, according to the SEC.
During his exit, Sweet allegedly took confidential and sensitive information about inspections to give him a leg up at KPMG. He also kept up with inspectors at the board, who continued to provide him with confidential information. These leaks, from his future co-defendants, followed a pattern: the leakers would go on to seek employment at KPMG and a new leaker was identified internally.
When KPMG supervisors learned about Sweet's information, he was encouraged to share it, according to regulators. Three former KPMG officials—David Middendorf, KPMG's then-national managing partner for audit quality and professional practice; Thomas Whittle, KPMG's then-national partner-in-charge for inspections; and David Britt, KPMG's banking and capital markets group co-leader—allegedly worked with Sweet and another former PCAOB inspector then at KPMG to minimize the risk that inspectors would find faults with the audits of seven unnamed banks.
Participants in the scheme were allegedly told by Middendorf and Whittle to keep mum about the purloined information.
According to the SEC, Sweet settled the civil charges against him. He's agreed to being barred from appearing or practicing as an accountant before the commission. Sweet likewise pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy charges of wire fraud and defrauding the federal government, according to a Department of Justice spokesman.
Sweet is represented by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Richard Morvillo.
“In stepping up and cooperating with the federal government, Mr. Sweet has taken a first step in addressing his mistakes, ” Morvillo said Monday.
The other five plaintiffs—Middendorf, Whittle, Britt, and two former PCAOB inspectors that joined Sweet at KPMG, Cynthia Holder and Jeffrey Wada—face civil Exchange Act and SEC rules violations, as well as parallel conspiracy charges.
On a conference call Monday, Steven Peikin, co-director of the SEC's enforcement division, described the alleged misconduct as “shocking and serious.”
“Our investigation is continuing, but the people we charged today have all been terminated by KPMG and the PCAOB,” Peikin said Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250