Vance to Eschew Donations From Lawyers With Business Before DA's Office
Months after weathering criticism over dropping investigations into two high-profile targets with lawyers who contributed to his election campaign, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. announced that he will no longer take donations from attorneys with business before his office.
January 22, 2018 at 06:03 PM
3 minute read
Cyrus Vance Jr., New York district attorney
Months after weathering criticism over dropping investigations into two high-profile targets with lawyers who contributed to the election campaign of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., the DA announced on Monday that he will no longer take donations from attorneys with business before his office.
In a statement from his campaign, Vance said he would implement a “blinding” procedure that conceals the names of donors as well as caps the amount he will take from law partners of attorneys appearing before his office.
Vance's announcement came on the same day that Columbia Law School's Center for the Advancement of Public Integrity released a report on Vance's fundraising practices that was completed at Vance's request but intended to apply to all 62 of New York's district attorneys.
The report suggests blind fundraising, limiting or refusing donations from attorneys that could present a conflict of interest and refusing donations from staff or their spouses.
The report states that political donations to DAs can be problematic, not only because of the possibility of real quid pro quo by a DA in exchange for donations or an unconscious bias in favor of a donor, but also because it can create the impression of “undue influence.”
“The vast majority of district attorneys are ethical and honest public servants, who make their decisions based entirely on appropriate, fact-based and relevant criteria,” the report states. “However, as DA Vance has recognized, even where decisions are made solely on the facts of the case at hand, there can be a perception problem when someone involved in a case before the DA has donated to the DA's campaign.”
Vance took heat in October when it was revealed his office dropped investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct against film mogul Harvey Weinstein and allegations that Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. made misleading statements to attract prospective buyers for the Trump SoHo hotel.
Marc Kasowitz of Kasowitz Benson Torres, a longtime attorney for the Trump family, donated more than $50,000 to Vance's campaign in two separate donations, but Vance has since returned the money.
David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner, who has represented Weinstein—though not before Vance's office—donated $10,000 to Vance's campaign after the investigation into Weinstein was dropped.
The Center for the Advancement of Public Integrity's report states that from 2008 to 2017, Vance took more than $2.3 million in donations from law firms.
Vance also said in the statement that the State Assembly should also take action to reform New York's campaign finance laws, which should include a matching funds program for DA's races.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readThe New Frontier in Legal Compliance: Privacy, Security, and Information Governance for Law Firms
5 minute readChanges at the Top: How 'Different Leadership Skills' Are Prevailing in Big Law
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250