Article on Millennials Breaks Free From Conventional Wisdom
Unlike so much tiresome, downbeat, and predictable coverage of legal education and law practice, and because she avoided the temptation to pick winners and losers, Ms. DeSantis portrays a vibrant, frankly exciting job market in the new world of law.
January 24, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Bravo! The New York Law Journal is an important publication serving as the paper of record for the legal community. It is also a reliable essential tool for keeping abreast of court decisions, legislation, and hard news about the profession. Susan DeSantis demonstrates how the paper also can be useful and a must read in other ways in her original, well researched, insightful, forward looking article “Millennial Attorneys Explain Why They Flock to Midsize Firms” (Thursday, January 18, p. 1).
The article is a fine example of discerning and attempting to understand trends in what always has been, and now is more so than ever, a dynamic, constantly evolving, competitive profession. Ms. DeSantis breaks free from conventional wisdom and resists looking in the rear view mirror when reporting on where the job market for recent graduates is heading. The result is a report that no doubt is provoking lively discussions about what new lawyers, employers and clients desire as they weigh their options. Unlike so much tiresome, downbeat, and predictable coverage of legal education and law practice, and because she avoided the temptation to pick winners and losers, Ms. DeSantis portrays a vibrant, frankly exciting job market in the new world of law.
Her findings ring true. To their credit, as DeSantis' extensive interviews underscore, millennials want to make a difference. They seek meaningful work and will pursue opportunities where they can develop professionally. They desire recognition for their accomplishments, and they are interested in jobs that allow personal enrichment and fulfillment outside the office. Millennials are hardly all alike, and, in fact, they respond to circumstances in contrast to the one-size-fits-all past approaches to legal education and entry level jobs in the profession. Now they know what they want, have information about where to find it, and will go after jobs wherever they may be that promise to meet their aspirations.
In this vein, it would be valuable to see even more coverage of developing treads. Increasingly, our graduates, and particularly law graduates pursuing jobs within the tri-state area, in addition to an array of jobs in different kinds of law firms, can find appealing in-house positions and many want to make good use of their legal education in jobs that may not be in a General Counsel's office. A law degree also can lead to a challenging job in finance or, for example, in a start-up business. Other major career trends point to the multinational, borderless nature of virtually every area of law, the value of proficiency in legal English in a multilingual, multicultural market, and the myriad practical issues relating to how law must be practiced in a digital marketplace. The implications for law schools and the need for them to adapt and adopt prudent innovations is clear. Millennials take a more consumerist attitude toward education than previous generations. As law students, they see themselves as customers paying for a service, and they are quick to judge whether a school rises to their expectations and needs. That is why law schools throughout New York and across the country are changing how and what students are taught, so that their graduates can land the jobs that they desire. This small sample of topics strongly suggests that the readers of NYLJ would benefit from more articles that look around corners at the future.
Nicholas W. Allard is the president and Joseph Crea Dean of Brooklyn Law School.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLong Island Midsize Firm and Managing Partner Sued for Sexual Harassment, Discrimination
6 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTroutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250