Governor's Attack on the Judiciary Is a Danger to Our Democracy
The governor as chief executive has no power or authority over the day to day operation of the courts. The three branches of our state's government are co-equal.
January 26, 2018 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
The 2018-2019 New York State fiscal year budget negotiations are in full swing in Albany. Governor Cuomo delivered his State of the State address to the Legislature, and a proposed budget has been put forth for us to decipher and scrutinize. During the governor's address, he made attention grabbing statements about, and a proposal regarding, the New York State judiciary. Under the governor's proposal, state-paid judges or justices assigned to trial courts of the state's Unified Court System would have to certify each month, in a statement, that they “performed judicial duties at an assigned court location for the full daily period of at least eight hours.” The state comptroller would also conduct periodic reviews and audit the certifications to “ensure that the state is responsibly authorizing state dollars for judicial salaries and the operation of state trial courts,“ according to legislation proposed by the governor's office. Comptroller Tom DiNapoli's office would then “evaluate the accuracy of the judicial certification and the effectiveness of the certification system as a whole,” according to the proposed legislation.
This is an imperious overreach by the governor, and an all out attack upon our state's Judicial branch. The New York State Constitution mirrors our federal constitution in relation to the principle of “separation of powers.” The intent is to prevent the concentration of power in one branch, and to provide for checks and balances. The governor as chief executive has no power or authority over the day to day operation of the courts. The three branches of our state's government are co-equal. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) is the administrative body sanctioned by the chief judge of our state's highest court to manage and oversee the day to day administration of the courts. Supervising judges have clerks come to the courtrooms in the morning and afternoon sessions daily to monitor courtroom activity. Daily activity logs are created and sent to OCA. The chief judge and her designees monitor the statistics of every judge closely.
Simply put, a governor should not interfere, impress his will or commandeer another co-equal branch. As our judges do their best to steer clear of the political world, you will not hear them complain, protest or condemn this overreach. It is however, incumbent upon members of the legislature to speak up, defend and protect the judicial branch against this overreach. This is the nature of the checks and balances that our State Constitution provides for.
During my career, I have had the privilege of working as a research assistant, a court attorney, and as a law clerk to a justice of the Supreme Court, and other judges within the Unified Court System. I can attest to the scholarship, diligence, professionalism and compassion of our judges in Staten Island and Brooklyn. I have no doubt that the same is true throughout the rest of the state. These men and women, who could make far more money in the private sector, devote themselves to public service because they believe in the law, and the concepts of justice and fairness. On a tight shoestring budget, the men and women of our judiciary undertake some of the most essential and important roles in our society.
The judges in our lower courts, criminal, civil, and housing, routinely put in much longer than eight hour days. Our criminal court judges work nights and weekends 365 days a year. Our judges start work early, and they take work home with them. They are constantly reading, learning, and even teaching, in our law schools, colleges and universities. These are not ordinary civil servants and they are not ordinary people. They are learned professionals and academics worthy of our respect, honor and admiration. They rarely get praise and we only hear about them in the press, however rarely, when something goes terribly wrong. The governor's proposal for the judiciary to 'punch a clock' is a disparaging and dangerous notion for our democracy.
Washington said that the administration of justice is the firmest pillar of government and that the courts are essential to the stability of our political system. Let us stand together upon that pillar, and and send a message to the governor that separation of powers is important, and that the checks and balances provided for in our State Constitution are still as strong and effective as they were when crafted over 240 years ago.
Ron Castorina Jr. is a New York state assemblyman.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Biblical Reconciliation Between Judaism and Islam: A Lesson for Everyone, Everywhere
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250