New York, Minnesota Sue Feds Over Health Care Funding Cuts
A federal lawsuit filed Friday by New York state and Minnesota alleges that the Trump administration is wrongfully withholding more than $1 billion in health care funding, jeopardizing the health care of roughly 800,000 people.
January 26, 2018 at 03:58 PM
3 minute read
A federal lawsuit filed in Manhattan Friday by the states of New York and Minnesota alleges that the Trump administration is wrongfully withholding more than $1 billion in health care funding, jeopardizing the health care of roughly 800,000 people.
The complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York comes in response to the Trump administration's decision to withhold payments from the Basic Health Program, a provision of the Obama-era Affordable Care Act that provides subsidized insurance coverage to low-income individuals who do not qualify for Medicaid. The Basic Health Program is contingent on congressional funding.
The civil complaint asks for declaratory and injunctive relief and names the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and Acting Secretary Eric Hargan as defendants.The U.S. Senate approved Alex Azar for secretary of HHS on Jan. 24.
HHS declined to comment on the lawsuit.
President Donald Trump in October ended the cost-sharing reduction payments to the Basic Health Program, known as the Essential Plan in New York and MinnesotaCare in Minnesota, arguing that the payments were illegal because Congress never appropriated the funding. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services then informed New York and Minnesota—the only two states to have a Basic Health Program—that they would no longer be receiving cost-share reduction payments. The cost-sharing payment covers roughly $1 billion for New York's Essential Plan per year and $128 million for MinnesotaCare.
The lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson claims that the logic behind ending cost-sharing reduction payments is “meritless” and shouldn't apply to Basic Health Programs, because the subsidized insurance program was written into the ACA.
“Even if Congress did not appropriate money to make CSR payments to insurers on exchanges, HHS would still be obligated to make full BHP payments—including any 'CSR component'—under the distinct statutory framework governing the BHP,” the lawsuit claims.
While New York and Minnesota submitted proposals to HHS that would restore the funding, the agency has “failed to respond to those well-supported proposals and instead continued its unlawful and unjustified determination to pay only a portion of the full funding owed,” a press release from Schneiderman's office claims.
Schneiderman's team on the lawsuit is composed of Elizabeth Chesler, assistant attorney general of the health care bureau; Lisa Landau, bureau chief of the health care bureau; Steven Wu, deputy solicitor general; Matthew W. Grieco, assistant solicitor general; Howard Master, senior enforcement counsel; and Eric Haren, special counsel and senior adviser.
Scott H. Ikeda (pro hac vice application forthcoming) assistant attorney general and Brandon Boese (pro hac vice application forthcoming), assistant attorney general are representing the Minnesota Attorney General's Office in the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readFor Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
4 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250