Murphy Joins Cuomo, Malloy in Vow to Sue Feds Over New Tax Law
They claim the federal tax overhaul approved by Congress in December and signed by President Donald Trump is illegal.
January 26, 2018 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy. Photo: Carmen Natale/ALM
The governors of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut said they are forming a coalition to sue the federal government over the newly enacted tax overhaul that caps deductibility of state and local taxes.
During a Jan. 26 conference call with reporters, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo repeated his criticism that the federal tax overhaul approved by Congress in December and signed by President Donald Trump is illegal.
“There is a very strong argument that the bill is a fundamental violation of states' rights and repugnant to the very concept of federalism that formed this nation,” Cuomo said in a conference call with newly installed and Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy. All three are Democrats.
The tax overhaul Trump signed in December caps a deduction for state and local taxes at $10,000—the deduction previously was unlimited—which may increase the federal tax liability for many homeowners in high-tax states such as New York and New Jersey.
Murphy said he expects the lawsuit against the federal government to be filed within weeks. A spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric Schneiderman confirmed that a lawsuit against the federal government has not yet been filed. A decision on the court in which it will be filed hasn't yet been made, Malloy said.
“We are having some conversations offline with other states and I think we'll choose the best and appropriate venue when the time comes. It probably will be a venue within our area,” Malloy said, referencing the tri-state area.
Earlier this month, during his annual State of the State address to the Legislature, Cuomo said he planned to sue the federal government over the federal tax law arguing that it violates constitutional principles. Legal experts who specialize in tax law, however, have doubted the likelihood of a success of such a legal challenge, because the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution allows Congress to collect taxes on incomes.
Cuomo said Jan. 26 the federal government is infringing on state's rights.
“States are not colonies of the federal government. This is purely double taxation. You are getting taxed on the state income tax and your property tax. … Legally we believe there's a very strong argument that it's unconstitutional,” Cuomo said on the call. “The federal government is trying to trample state's rights.''
Cuomo, an Albany Law School graduate who is said to have presidential ambitions, added that discovery in the upcoming lawsuit will be critical.
“I would caution against making any legal conclusion on legal precedence until you know the facts here. The discovery here is going to be key. This is a bill that was passed in the dead of night. This is a bill that had the least transparency. In discovery, you're going to see emails between the White House and the Senate, and the White House and the Congress. How did they pick these 12 states? On what basis did they pick these 12 states? Did you really think it was a coincidence … that Trump lost all of these states? Do you really think it's a coincidence that they are blue states? … All you need is one email that says 'these are Democratic states and therefore we can get it passed.' Now you have a targeting for political reasons and now you're off to the races,” Cuomo said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
Establishing the Prevailing Party; Failure To Comply With LLC Law; Takings Claim: This Week in Scott Mollen's Realty Law Digest
GOP's National Gains Prompt NY Gov., AG, to Brace for Legal Battles Over Equal Rights Measure
Trending Stories
- 1The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 2New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 3Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 4Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 5Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250