New Bronx Opioid Treatment Court Looks to Help Addicts Kick Their Addiction
Seeking to reach defendants who suffer from opioid addiction with a helping hand rather than a heavy one, the Bronx Criminal Court has opened a new…
January 29, 2018 at 07:14 PM
4 minute read
Seeking to reach defendants who suffer from opioid addiction with a helping hand rather than a heavy one, the Bronx Criminal Court has opened a new program to steer low-level offenders at risk of an opioid overdose into treatment. The Bronx program, called Overdose Avoidance and Recovery, is in its eighth week of operation and has guided more than 50 defendants into treatment. It is the second such program established in New York state. The first opened in Buffalo last May. It has attracted the attention of courts and other justice system stakeholders who are interested in emulating the model elsewhere. In the Bronx, offenders charged with seventh-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance who are at risk of overdose, are offered intensive drug treatment rather than being hit with jail time. If the offenders are successful with their treatment program, their cases are dismissed and sealed. "OAR is not about crime and punishment, but about compassion and recovery," said George Grasso, supervising judge for Bronx Criminal Court and one of the judges presiding over an overdose avoidance program. On Monday, Grasso invited reporters and TV cameras into his courtroom to get a view of the proceedings. Participants in the OAR track were not named, and were called out by their order on the day's calendar. "Calendar No. 4" was not present for proceedings because he was in an inpatient treatment program at Mount Sinai Hospital, explained his attorney, Maya Graham of the Legal Aid Society. Grasso said he was appreciative the offender opted to switch to an inpatient program after the outpatient program wasn't getting results. "We will, in this proceeding, bend over backwards to help him," Grasso said. Later in the proceedings, after the cameras departed, Grasso called "calendar No. 5," a slender man with long hair pulled back into a ponytail who was wearing jeans and a dark jacket. Grasso said it was the court's goal to help this particular offender beat a fentanyl addiction. Carmen Alcantara of Bronx Community Solutions told the judge she would be able to enroll the man into an outpatient treatment program at Bronx Lebanon Hospital, which offers detox services as part of the recovery track. Grasso asked the man if he understood the plan, but he was silent for a moment before turning to speak to his attorney from The Bronx Defenders. The man shook his head several times. The Bronx Defenders attorney asked Grasso to repeat the question, which he did, with an added warning that fentanyl "will kill you." "Every time you use it, you got to assume it's going to be the last time," Grasso said. The man then agreed to leave with Alcantara to get into the treatment program. The program in the Bronx differs from the Opioid Intervention Court set up in Buffalo in that participants are drawn from a wider array of nonviolent offenses, such as defendants charged with burglary, said Buffalo City Court Judge Craig Hannah, who presides over the program. Hannah said that there have been more than 230 participants in the program in Buffalo, one of whom succumbed to an overdose-related death. Christopher Deutsch, communications director for the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, said the opioid treatment programs at work in Buffalo and the Bronx are best viewed as an enhancement of the traditional drug court model, which typically involves a full battery of services to help offenders get their lives on track. Because of the dangers of opioid abuse, rapid responses are often needed to save defendants' lives, Deutsch said. The treatment court models now in use in New York can allow courts to move swiftly. "When it comes to opioids, any delay in treatment can be deadly," Deutsch said. "We've got to find a way to respond faster." Deutsch said that since the intervention program opened in Buffalo, he has spoken to drug court professionals in other jurisdictions who are interested in adapting the model in their own communities, though the challenge is often ensuring there is enough "treatment infrastructure"—or beds in local facilities—to handle the offenders who seek help.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Told Archegos Founder Can't Afford What Defense Says Is 'Unjustified' $10 Billion Restitution
Trump Nominates Ex-SEC Chief Jay Clayton to Helm Southern District of New York US Attorney's Office
NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
Election Roundup: Democrats Elected as New DAs in Albany, Erie Counties
Trending Stories
- 1McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 2Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 3Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
- 4Spencer Lawton, Savannah Prosecutor Who Tried ‘Midnight in the Garden’ Case, Dies at 81
- 5Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250