NY Reaches Agreement on Lavern's Law Medical Malpractice Bill
Gov. Andrew Cuomo and legislative leaders have reached an agreement on a bill that extends the amount of time a patient has to file a medical malpractice lawsuit for a missed cancer diagnosis.
January 29, 2018 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
ALBANY — Gov. Andrew Cuomo and legislative leaders have reached an agreement on a controversial bill that would extend the amount of time in which a patient can file a medical malpractice lawsuit for a missed cancer diagnosis.
The agreement on Lavern's Law—named after Lavern Wilkinson of the Bronx, who died in 2013 at the age of 41—puts to bed concerns by hospitals, physicians and medical malpractice insurers that there would be an influx of lawsuits costing them millions of dollars.
The bill, which was approved by lawmakers during the last few days of the legislative session in June 2017 but had awaited the governor's signature, would start the clock on when patients can bring medical malpractice cases involving cancers or malignant tumors from when the error is discovered by the patient, instead of when the misdiagnosis occurred, as is the case now.
The agreed-upon final version of the bill would change the statute of limitation to sue for a missed cancer diagnosis to two-and-a-half years from the time the patient discovers the misdiagnosis. Current law limits the window to 15 months after the misdiagnosis occurred, meaning some patients lost the right to sue before they even became aware of the misdiagnosis.
Under the agreement, the two-and-a-half year statute of limitations would run from the date that the plaintiff knew or should have known of the negligence, instead of the date when the negligence occurred, with an outer limit of seven years from the date of occurrence, according to a news release from Cuomo's office. The legislation and the amendments are expected to pass both houses as early as Tuesday.
Wilkinson, for whom the legislation is named, died in 2013 from a “treatable form of lung cancer.” Her doctors failed to tell her that a chest X-ray taken in 2010 showed a suspicious, two- centimeter mass on her right lung, according to the New York Daily News, which has written numerous editorials urging passage of the legislation. In May 2012, Wilkinson returned to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn with a chronic cough. A chest X-ray found that the cancer had spread throughout her body. By the time Wilkinson learned of the doctors' error in 2012, the statute of limitation for her to file a lawsuit had expired.
State Sen. John DeFrancisco, the deputy majority leader and sponsor of Lavern's Law, had been pessimistic about the governor signing the bill.
“I had been pessimistic because it kept getting weakened and weakened and weakened and I had the distinct impression that it was going to get too weak and it wouldn't be worth the effort,” DeFrancisco, R-Syracuse, told the New York Law Journal on Monday afternoon. “I think it's a reasonable compromise. I would have liked the original bill better. But i'm just happy that now people do have some redress, in at least cancer cases, where they can bring suit if there's negligence.”
DeFrancisco, who is expected to announce his bid for governor tomorrow, is of counsel at Syracuse-based personal injury firm DeFrancisco & Falgiatano.
For months, representatives from the influential Trial Lawyers Association and hospital trade groups—such as the Healthcare Association of New York State and Greater New York Hospital Association—have been in negotiations over the bill.
“Lavern's Law is the result of an extremely committed coalition of advocates, courageous patients and their families and others who came together to address injustice. We will continue to work across New York to make our state fairer, safer and more equitable for New Yorkers of all walks of life,” said Matt Funk, president of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome': DOJ Proposes Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250