Manhattan DA's Boroughwide Diversion Program Launches
The initiative is based on a pilot program for 16- and 17-year-old offenders that launched three years ago in northern Manhattan.
February 01, 2018 at 02:07 PM
3 minute read
A diversion program touted as highly successful by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office is set to expand to cover even more low-level offenders this month.
The Project Reset program originally began as a pilot program in 2015 to divert 16- and 17-year-olds in northern Manhattan arrested for low-level offenses from being prosecuted. Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s office found that participants in the two-session program resulted in recidivism rates as low as 8 percent.
In 2017, Vance announced the program would expand to include participants 18 years and older who were first-time offenders charged with nonviolent misdemeanors across the borough. The $6.5 million initiative, funded through banking violation asset forfeitures, would be run by the Center for Court Innovation, the Osborne Association and Young New Yorkers, with each organization responsible for different Manhattan communities. The program is expected to serve 5,000 people a year.
“The criminal prosecution of these low-level, non-violent offenses should not be a part of a reformed 21st century justice system,” Vance said in a statement. “Absent a demonstrated public safety risk, criminally prosecuting New Yorkers accused of these offenses does not make us safer. Today, by committing to divert these misdemeanor cases out of Criminal Court in Manhattan, we will further eliminate unnecessary incarceration, and reduce the risks of deportation, loss of housing, and loss of employment that often accompany a criminal prosecution.”
In a letter reviewed by the New York Law Journal from the DA's Office to be sent to eligible participants, individuals are informed that completion of the program will mean they will not have to go to court, appear before a judge or get a criminal record. The program lasts two to four hours over the course of one to two days, “and is designed to be productive, offer resources, and make connections to additional services, if needed,” the letter states.
Beginning Thursday, participation is open to all those eligible in central and northern Manhattan, according to the letter. The Center for Court Innovation is operating programming for all ages in its community court in Midtown, as well as for 16- and 17-year-olds at its Harlem Justice Center. Those 18 and older in northern Manhattan are directed to the Osborne Association facility in Harlem.
Currently, only teenage participants are eligible for programming in lower Manhattan provided by the Center for Court Innovation. For adults, programming is expected to become available for arrests that occur after July 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 2Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 3Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 4Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 5Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250