Offit Kurman's Deal With Eaton & Van Winkle Collapses
Absorbing most of New York's Eaton & Van Winkle would have been mid-Atlantic firm Offit Kurman's biggest group hire to date. But the plan fell apart at the last minute.
February 15, 2018 at 03:23 PM
3 minute read
Offit Kurman's New York expansion plans have hit a speed bump, as the mid-Atlantic, midsize firm's agreement to affiliate with New York's Eaton & Van Winkle fell apart at the last minute.
Offit Kurman announced in January that it would be acquiring much of what remained of Eaton & Van Winkle, including 16 lawyers and office space at 3 Park Avenue in Manhattan. The deal was set to take effect Feb. 1, but did not come to fruition.
“Eaton & Van Winkle has excellent attorneys, but their firm faced serious business challenges that we're unable to overcome to consummate a firm-to-firm affiliation,” Offit Kurman managing principal Tim Lynch said in a statement Thursday.
Eaton & Van Winkle's fate is unclear now that the deal is not coming together. In a statement, partner Ted Semaya said, “The determination has not been made about their future other than the firm is not affiliating with Offit Kurman. EVW is still examining all options to continue operating.”
Offit Kurman still expects up to eight of Eaton & Van Winkle's attorneys to make the move, Lynch said. One, Brendan Marx, has already joined Offit Kurman's New York office, the firm said.
The deal was never planned to be a merger in the legal sense, but Offit Kurman was planning to take over Eaton & Van Winkle's office space. Now Offit Kurman will continue working out of a temporary office, with hopes of finding a permanent space in the near future, a firm spokesman said.
The spokesman said Offit Kurman plans to forge ahead with other expansion plans in New York, with more potential lateral hires in the pipeline, aside from any Eaton & Van Winkle attorneys who may still join.
Eaton & Van Winkle has operated under its current name since 1965, and it can trace its roots in the New York legal market back nearly 200 years. The firm had grown to about 40 lawyers in the early 2000s, then started to see “a particularly high loss of lawyers” in 2015, Semaya said in a January interview. So the partnership started looking at options for combining with another firm.
“We decided it would be hard to grow back with just ones or twos,” Semaya said in January. Becoming part of Offit Kurman, he said, would have allowed him and his colleagues to benefit from a larger footprint, complementary practice areas and more rate flexibility because of the firm's presence in lower rate markets.
Offit Kurman was founded in the Baltimore region in 1987 with a focus on serving privately held businesses. It kicked off its regional expansion nearly two decades later, starting with Washington, D.C., in 2005 and the Philadelphia region in 2007—the same year it crossed the 100-lawyer threshold. Offit has said the firm, now with a head count of 140 lawyers, aims to have 200 lawyers by 2020.
Offit Kurman began looking for ways to expand in New York in early 2017, Offit said in January. Historically, the firm has grown in each of its regions by hiring small groups of attorneys, he said, and absorbing Eaton & Van Winkle's lawyers would have been the biggest deal yet.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSchnader Waited Too Long to Merge, While Stroock's Fate Lies in the Balance
8 minute read4 More Troutman Exits Bolster Goodwin's Life Sciences Practice in Phila., NY
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250