NY Financial Regulator to Probe Insurance Denials to Users of HIV Prevention Medicine
A New York financial regulator is investigating reports that some life and disability insurers are denying coverage to applicants who used medication meant to reduce the risk of HIV infection.
February 15, 2018 at 05:33 PM
3 minute read
A New York financial regulator is probing allegations that some life and disability insurers are denying coverage to applicants who use pre-exposure prophylactic medication meant to reduce the risk of HIV infection in adults.
Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo said Wednesday that the department, which regulates banks and insurance companies operating in the state, would investigate the insurance companies after a report by The New York Times that some gay men who had used PrEP medication—approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reduce the risk of acquiring the virus that causes AIDS—had been turned down for life and disability insurance policies across the United States.
According to the Times, health insurance companies usually cover PrEP medication, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention approved in 2014 guidelines for those “at substantial risk of infection.” But some life, long-term care and disability insurers have been denying policies to those who took the drugs. Some gay rights advocates and others say the charge amounts to discrimination against gay men. At least one lawsuit has been filed against an insurer for denying a gay male applicant long-term care coverage citing PrEP use, the news organization said.
In a statement announcing the investigation Wednesday, Vullo said “insurers cannot choose to deny life and disability insurance coverage based on discriminatory reasons. There is absolutely no legal justification for denying or limiting insurance coverage simply because an individual takes pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a prescription drug used for the prevention of HIV infection. This is tantamount to penalizing applicants based on sexual orientation. DFS will not tolerate discriminatory treatment in the approval or denial of life, long-term care and disability insurance policies and will hold companies that discriminate accountable.”
A spokesman for the Washington-based American Council of Life Insurers, a trade group representing the industry, said in an email Thursday afternoon that a confluence of criteria —such as height, weight and medical history — are taken into consideration when underwriting a life insurance policy. Spokesman Jack Dolan added that New York state laws and federal law “strictly govern their underwriting practices” in a highly competitive market.
“The life insurance industry is very competitive with 171 life insurers licensed to do business in New York working to serve consumers' financial needs. Establishing their own underwriting criteria in accordance with relevant New York laws is one way individual companies can differentiate themselves from their competitors. As a result, insurers might evaluate the same applicant differently and, therefore, make different decisions on issuance and pricing. Because underwriting guidelines vary by company we recommend that applicants shop around to find the best policy for them,” Dolan said in the email.
Update: This story has been updated to include response from the American Council of Life Insurers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Testing The Limits of “I Agree”: Court of Appeals Examines Clickwrap Arbitration Agreements
13 minute readAntitrust Yearly Recap: Aggressive Changes By The Biden Administration Precede President Trump’s Return
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250