US Bank Agrees to $613M Penalty Over Anti-Money Laundering Failures
The nation's fifth-largest bank acknowledged its deficiencies in properly reviewing transactions to check for suspicious activity.
February 15, 2018 at 02:54 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Bank has agreed to pay a total of $613 million in penalties to multiple federal authorities over its failures to properly monitor banking transactions for suspicious activity, federal prosecutors and regulators announced Thursday.
The bank agreed to a $528 million penalty to resolve two felony violations of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Southern District of New York announced Thursday.
According to federal prosecutors, the bank—the fifth largest in the country—willfully failed to institute an adequate anti-money laundering program while also failing to file a suspicious activity report. The bank accepted responsibility for its conduct, prosecutors said.
In exchange for a two-year deferred prosecution agreement, the bank agreed to a $453 million civil forfeiture, as well as a $75 million civil penalty assessed by the Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency. Additionally, the bank has agreed to an additional $70 million penalty to settle related regulatory actions taken by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
In a statement, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman called the bank's anti-money laundering program “highly inadequate.”
“The bank operated the program 'on the cheap' by restricting head count and other compliance resources, and then imposed hard caps on the number of transactions subject to AML review in order to create the appearance that the program was operating properly,” he said. “The bank also concealed its wrongful approach from the OCC. As a result, U.S. Bank failed to detect and investigate large numbers of suspicious transactions.”
Prosecutors say beginning in 2009 the bank instituted its caps on alerts from its transaction monitoring system. Rather than setting the alerts that corresponded to a transaction's level of risk, the bank chose to make staffing levels and resources the determining factors. It then “deliberately concealed” its process from the OCC, which is its primary regulator, prosecutors said.
The bank was aware of the problem, with internal memos between top bank officials warning that a “regulator could very easily argue that this testing should lead to an increase in the number of queries worked,” prosecutors said, quoting from the communications. Internal tests by the bank found suspicious activity reports should have been filed on anywhere between 25 to 80 percent of the test transactions. Rather than change its practices, the bank instead simply stopped conducting the internal tests, prosecutors said.
The bank was specifically put on notice that Scott Tucker, the former race car driver convicted last year of racketeering, was using the bank to launder funds from the payday lending scheme he would later be convicted of. For two years, the bank failed to report suspicious activity, prosecutors said, despite closing accounts for shell companies being used by Tucker in 2011. The bank allowed $176 million in illegal funds to flow through its system for Tucker over the next two years.
In a statement, U.S. Bank CEO and president Andy Cecere said the company regrets its past deficiencies.
“Our culture of ethics and integrity demands that we do better,” he said. “One of U.S. Bank's key priorities is to maintain an exceptional AML program and we are confident in the strength of the program we have in place today.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250