Bitcoin Platform Operator Allegedly Lied to SEC Over Hack
Jon Montroll's now-defunct BitFunder allegedly misappropriated cryptocurrency deposits even before hackers stole over 6,000 of the digital currency.
February 21, 2018 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
A former cryptocurrency platform operator was charged by the Justice Department and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday with fraud and making false statements after lying to regulators about a 2013 hack of his system that saw thieves abscond with bitcoins valued currently at over $60 million.
BitFunder founder Jon Montroll of Texas was charged by the SEC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York with operating an unregistered securities exchange that defrauded users by allegedly misappropriating bitcoins and failing to disclose the cyberattack that resulted in the theft of thousands of bitcoins in late summer 2013.
According to regulators, Montroll was using his Australia-based cryptocurrency investment platform, WeExchange. Users deposited bitcoins into the exchange, which allowed investors to deal in virtual shares of cryptocurrency-related enterprises. At all times, Montroll controlled access to the digital “wallet.”
Even ahead of the cyberattack, investigators allege Montroll offered an unregistered security that Montroll said would be used for private investment purpose. Investigators allege he misappropriated funds from the digital sale of this security to pay personnel and business expenses, and to replenish bitcoins he'd already misappropriated form BitFunder prior to the offering.
Then the cyberattack occurred. Over the course of a month from late July to late August, a group of BitFunder users attacked the platform, stealing more than 6,000 bitcoins. Yet Montroll never reported the attack to anyone, including investors in the security he'd offered, which was supposed to generate a return of 0.05 percent a day. He continued to accept deposits and solicit investments, using new bitcoin deposits to fund withdrawal requests after the cyberattack, according to regulators.
By November 2013, users were beginning to experience problems attempting to withdraw bitcoins from WeExchange. At first, Montroll claimed technical problems. But by Nov. 14, he shut BitFunder down.
Federal prosecutors said Montroll provided sworn testimony that same month to SEC officials as part of its investigation into the hack and BitFunder's business practices. Montroll denied he'd been hacked, claiming the system prevented any theft. He went so far, they allege, as to produce a screenshot showing a balance as of Oct. 13, 2013, of nearly 6,680 bitcoins in the WeExchange account.
Prosecutors allege that was a fabrication. In reality, the balance represented the infusion of bitcoins from his own account in an attempt to cover up the theft. Later, prosecutors said Montroll continued to lie, even when presented with evidence he had manually changed the balance in the WeExchange account. He told SEC investigators he only found out about the hack after the SEC had approached him, despite investigators having found out he was chatting with people online about how to track down stolen bitcoins during the month the hacking occurred.
“SEC investigations rely on learning the full and accurate facts concerning financial markets and products. As alleged, the defendant repeatedly lied during sworn testimony and misled SEC staff to avoid taking personal responsibility for the loss of thousands of his customers' bitcoins,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman for the Southern District of New York said in a statement. “These charges signify that we will use the full force of the federal criminal law to protect the integrity of the SEC's investigative process.”
Jay Dewald, a partner with the Texas law firm Jackson Walker, is representing Montroll, according to the US Attorney's Office. He did not return a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250