Bitcoin Platform Operator Allegedly Lied to SEC Over Hack
Jon Montroll's now-defunct BitFunder allegedly misappropriated cryptocurrency deposits even before hackers stole over 6,000 of the digital currency.
February 21, 2018 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
A former cryptocurrency platform operator was charged by the Justice Department and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday with fraud and making false statements after lying to regulators about a 2013 hack of his system that saw thieves abscond with bitcoins valued currently at over $60 million.
BitFunder founder Jon Montroll of Texas was charged by the SEC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York with operating an unregistered securities exchange that defrauded users by allegedly misappropriating bitcoins and failing to disclose the cyberattack that resulted in the theft of thousands of bitcoins in late summer 2013.
According to regulators, Montroll was using his Australia-based cryptocurrency investment platform, WeExchange. Users deposited bitcoins into the exchange, which allowed investors to deal in virtual shares of cryptocurrency-related enterprises. At all times, Montroll controlled access to the digital “wallet.”
Even ahead of the cyberattack, investigators allege Montroll offered an unregistered security that Montroll said would be used for private investment purpose. Investigators allege he misappropriated funds from the digital sale of this security to pay personnel and business expenses, and to replenish bitcoins he'd already misappropriated form BitFunder prior to the offering.
Then the cyberattack occurred. Over the course of a month from late July to late August, a group of BitFunder users attacked the platform, stealing more than 6,000 bitcoins. Yet Montroll never reported the attack to anyone, including investors in the security he'd offered, which was supposed to generate a return of 0.05 percent a day. He continued to accept deposits and solicit investments, using new bitcoin deposits to fund withdrawal requests after the cyberattack, according to regulators.
By November 2013, users were beginning to experience problems attempting to withdraw bitcoins from WeExchange. At first, Montroll claimed technical problems. But by Nov. 14, he shut BitFunder down.
Federal prosecutors said Montroll provided sworn testimony that same month to SEC officials as part of its investigation into the hack and BitFunder's business practices. Montroll denied he'd been hacked, claiming the system prevented any theft. He went so far, they allege, as to produce a screenshot showing a balance as of Oct. 13, 2013, of nearly 6,680 bitcoins in the WeExchange account.
Prosecutors allege that was a fabrication. In reality, the balance represented the infusion of bitcoins from his own account in an attempt to cover up the theft. Later, prosecutors said Montroll continued to lie, even when presented with evidence he had manually changed the balance in the WeExchange account. He told SEC investigators he only found out about the hack after the SEC had approached him, despite investigators having found out he was chatting with people online about how to track down stolen bitcoins during the month the hacking occurred.
“SEC investigations rely on learning the full and accurate facts concerning financial markets and products. As alleged, the defendant repeatedly lied during sworn testimony and misled SEC staff to avoid taking personal responsibility for the loss of thousands of his customers' bitcoins,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman for the Southern District of New York said in a statement. “These charges signify that we will use the full force of the federal criminal law to protect the integrity of the SEC's investigative process.”
Jay Dewald, a partner with the Texas law firm Jackson Walker, is representing Montroll, according to the US Attorney's Office. He did not return a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 2Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 3Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 4Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 5Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250