Some Clarity for Regulatory Takings
In this Condemnation and Tax Certiorari column, Jonathan Houghton writes: The law of regulatory takings can be a difficult labyrinth for the uninitiated. However, the 'Baycrest' decision has created a clearer landscape.
February 26, 2018 at 02:45 PM
7 minute read
Determining whether or not a government regulation constitutes a “taking” for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment (“…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”) can be a complex endeavor. The law of regulatory takings is characterized by a body of U.S. Supreme Court law that often tends to create questions more than it provides answers. Nonetheless, in New York, some clarity has been achieved by the recent Second Department decision in Matter of New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 3 (Baycrest Manor), 156 A.D.3d 163 (2d Dep't 2017).
It addressed three important issues in the field of regulatory takings and, together with other recent cases from that department, provided some guidance for the future.
The underlying case was not a regulatory taking per se. Rather, the City of New York condemned property via eminent domain that was 100 percent wetlands. Had the City not taken title, the owner could have filed an inverse condemnation action against the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, claiming that the wetlands restrictions were a regulatory taking. Therefore, in this condemnation action the just compensation was equal to the property's value as regulated wetlands, plus that additional amount that the owner could have received as a result of the regulatory takings action. For the curious, this methodology is spelled out in Berwick v. State, 107 A.D.2d 79, 84 (2d Dep't 1985).
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250