Advocates, Lawmakers Urge Senate GOP to Pass Child Victims Act
The Child Victims Act, if passed, would extend criminal and civil statutes of limitations. It would give victims of previous sexual assaults a one-year window in the civil statute of limitations from the effective date of the law in which victims of any age could seek damages for sex abuse instances in the past.
February 27, 2018 at 05:29 PM
3 minute read
ALBANY — Lawmakers and victims of childhood sexual assault gathered at the state Capitol Tuesday to urge Republican lawmakers to pass a bill that would allow victims to sue for decades-old abuse.
The Child Victims Act, if passed, would extend criminal and civil statutes of limitations. It would give victims of previous sexual assaults a one-year window in the civil statute of limitations in which victims, regardless of age, could seek damages for sex abuse instances in the past.
The proposal has been backed by the Democratic-controlled Assembly and Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who included the measure in his executive budget proposal, but has languished for years in the Republican-controlled Senate.
At the press conference, state Senate Democrats blamed Republicans for blocking the bill, saying any measures to weaken the legislation wouldn't be acceptable.
“Time after time, year after year, the Senate Republicans have blocked the important bill. I think all of us here and most people, frankly, have a really hard time trying to figure out why anybody would oppose this legislation. The bill is going to provide justice for people who are very badly hurt,” said Sen. Minority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester.
With the state budget due by the start of the fiscal year on April 1, the legislation's proponents are hoping that it is yoked into the state's fiscal plan. Any action to remove the measure or to “water down this bill would be a disservice to New York and New Yorkers,” Stewart-Cousins said.
A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan, R-Smithtown, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Under current state law, the five-year limitations period to file a claim for a felony sex crime begins when the victim turns 18. Under the legislation, the five-year limitations period would begin when the victim turns 23. For civil action involving a sex crime against a child, the current law begins the statute at the age of 18. Under the bill, the statute of limitations would be tolled and a lawsuit by a victim would be permitted up until the victim is 50 years old.
Stephen Jimenez, who was molested as a child in Catholic school and co-founded New Yorkers Against Hidden Predators, a coalition of groups and advocates, said advocates have met with Flanagan's staff to discuss the legislation.
Flanagan's office asked advocates about the one-year window that would allow victims to retroactively file lawsuits against their abusers, Jimenez said. Keeping the window is a “nonnegotiable” issue, he added.
Advocates have been emboldened by the #MeToo movement spurred by sexual harassment and assault allegations levied against movie producer Harvey Weinstein in October and numerous other powerful public figures in Hollywood, government and the media since then, by women and men.
“I personally believe that one of the reasons it's taken us so long to address this is because there's a taboo,” Jimenez said. “Where we are right now, thanks in part to the Me Too movement and to the work of many of my colleagues here, is that this is now a subject that the country is very much aware of and the country is saying 'no more.'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
4 minute readDistressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250