DFS Demands Info From Insurers About Alleged Coverage Denials to Users of HIV Prevention Meds
New York's banking and insurance regulator is asking life, long-term care and disability insurers to show actuarial evidence for allegedly denying coverage to applicants who used pre-exposure prophylactic medication meant to reduce the risk of HIV infection in adults.
February 27, 2018 at 03:22 PM
3 minute read
ALBANY - New York's banking and insurance regulator is asking life and disability insurers to show actuarial justification for allegedly denying coverage to applicants who used pre-exposure prophylactic medication to reduce the risk of HIV infection.
On Monday, the state Department of Financial Services sent a letter to insurers authorized to write life, disability and long-term care insurance in New York, seeking information on their underwriting guidelines and practices related to HIV prevention medication.
In the letter, the department said it's specifically seeking “information about the company's underwriting guidelines and practices where a consumer applies for life insurance, disability insurance or long-term care insurance and the applicant is engaging in or has engaged in a HIV prevention strategy, such as PrEP,” as well as any actuarial justification or supporting evidence for denying a person's insurance application for using such a drug.
Less than two weeks ago, the DFS said it would investigate insurance companies after a report by The New York Times found that some gay men who had used PrEP—a medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reduce the risk of acquiring the virus that causes AIDS—had been turned down for life and disability insurance policies across the country.
While most health insurers cover PrEP medication, some life, long-term and disability insurers have been denying policies to those who have taken the medication, which some gay rights activists say amounts to discrimination, the publication reported. At least one lawsuit has been filed against an insurer for allegedly denying a gay male applicant long-term care coverage citing PrEP use, the Times said.
Responses to the DFS' inquiry must be submitted on or by March 19, 2018, under penalty of perjury by a senior officer.
The Life Insurance Council of New York Inc. (LICONY), an industry organization, said its members will comply with DFS' request for information.
“New York's life insurance companies provide millions of people with the financial protection they need to protect their families and are constantly seeking ways to offer new coverage and products to consumers. Additionally, our industry is highly regulated by the state and our companies work very hard to comply with all state laws and regulations. In this highly competitive industry, each company makes its own individual underwriting decisions and that allows consumers to find policies that meet their needs,” LICONY said in an emailed statement to the New York Law Journal.
A spokesman for the Washington-based American Council of Life Insurers, a trade group representing the industry, said in an email that life insurers evaluate the same applicants differently and make different decisions on issuance and pricing.
Spokesman Jack Dolan added that the organization “is not positioned to offer comments to the department” because it represented the insurance industry and it does not hold information on individual companies' underwriting practices.
“In our communications with the DFS, we make clear that America's life insurers are in the business of providing people the financial protection they want and need and seek ways to offer coverage to as many people as possible. Laws in New York, and state laws throughout the country, strictly govern their underwriting practices,” Dolan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250