DFS Demands Info From Insurers About Alleged Coverage Denials to Users of HIV Prevention Meds
New York's banking and insurance regulator is asking life, long-term care and disability insurers to show actuarial evidence for allegedly denying coverage to applicants who used pre-exposure prophylactic medication meant to reduce the risk of HIV infection in adults.
February 27, 2018 at 03:22 PM
3 minute read
ALBANY - New York's banking and insurance regulator is asking life and disability insurers to show actuarial justification for allegedly denying coverage to applicants who used pre-exposure prophylactic medication to reduce the risk of HIV infection.
On Monday, the state Department of Financial Services sent a letter to insurers authorized to write life, disability and long-term care insurance in New York, seeking information on their underwriting guidelines and practices related to HIV prevention medication.
In the letter, the department said it's specifically seeking “information about the company's underwriting guidelines and practices where a consumer applies for life insurance, disability insurance or long-term care insurance and the applicant is engaging in or has engaged in a HIV prevention strategy, such as PrEP,” as well as any actuarial justification or supporting evidence for denying a person's insurance application for using such a drug.
Less than two weeks ago, the DFS said it would investigate insurance companies after a report by The New York Times found that some gay men who had used PrEP—a medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reduce the risk of acquiring the virus that causes AIDS—had been turned down for life and disability insurance policies across the country.
While most health insurers cover PrEP medication, some life, long-term and disability insurers have been denying policies to those who have taken the medication, which some gay rights activists say amounts to discrimination, the publication reported. At least one lawsuit has been filed against an insurer for allegedly denying a gay male applicant long-term care coverage citing PrEP use, the Times said.
Responses to the DFS' inquiry must be submitted on or by March 19, 2018, under penalty of perjury by a senior officer.
The Life Insurance Council of New York Inc. (LICONY), an industry organization, said its members will comply with DFS' request for information.
“New York's life insurance companies provide millions of people with the financial protection they need to protect their families and are constantly seeking ways to offer new coverage and products to consumers. Additionally, our industry is highly regulated by the state and our companies work very hard to comply with all state laws and regulations. In this highly competitive industry, each company makes its own individual underwriting decisions and that allows consumers to find policies that meet their needs,” LICONY said in an emailed statement to the New York Law Journal.
A spokesman for the Washington-based American Council of Life Insurers, a trade group representing the industry, said in an email that life insurers evaluate the same applicants differently and make different decisions on issuance and pricing.
Spokesman Jack Dolan added that the organization “is not positioned to offer comments to the department” because it represented the insurance industry and it does not hold information on individual companies' underwriting practices.
“In our communications with the DFS, we make clear that America's life insurers are in the business of providing people the financial protection they want and need and seek ways to offer coverage to as many people as possible. Laws in New York, and state laws throughout the country, strictly govern their underwriting practices,” Dolan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250