Prosecutors Portray Percoco as Willing Bribe-Taker, Defense Questions Star Witness' Credibility
Prosecutors in the corruption trial for Joseph Percoco, a former top aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, wrapped up their case on Tuesday by portraying Percoco as willing to abuse the powers of his office in exchange for bribes.
February 27, 2018 at 05:03 PM
4 minute read
Prosecutors in the corruption trial for Joseph Percoco, a former top aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, wrapped up their case on Tuesday by portraying Percoco as willing to abuse the powers of his office in exchange for bribes.
But defense attorneys who also presented summations on Tuesday turned their sights on Todd Howe, the prosecutors' star witness in the case, whose credibility was continually challenged throughout the six-week trial and who was arrested at one point after admitting on the stand that he violated the terms of his cooperation agreement with the government.
Percoco is accused of taking more than $300,000 in bribes that included a “low-show” job for his wife as an education consultant for Competitive Power Ventures Inc., an energy company that sought a power purchase agreement from the state.
Percoco is also accused of taking $35,000 in bribes from COR Development, a developer that sought government contracts for projects in the Syracuse area.
Howe, a former lobbyist for Whiteman Osterman & Hanna who has been friends with Percoco for decades, testified that he played a key role in facilitating the contacts between Percoco and his co-defendants.
Percoco is standing trial alongside former CPV executive Peter Galbraith Kelly and former COR executives Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi. Neither of the defendants took the stand at the trial.
While presenting the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney David Zhou focused on the repeated use of “ziti” by Percoco and Howe in emails to describe alleged bribe payments, a reference to a term used for money on the “The Sopranos,” a TV show about the mob.
“This is not how honest and honorable public servants talk,” Zhou said. “This is how criminals talk.”
Zhou said that Percoco was willing to show off the “trappings of power” in exchange for bribes.
With respect to the alleged “low-show” job for Percoco's wife, Lisa Toscano-Percoco, Zhou said she was paid a $90,000 annual salary for teaching a total of 66 hours over a two-year period, while another individual who held the same position was paid $30,000 a year.
“We have put more time in this trial than Lisa Percoco put in her $90,000-a-year job,” Zhou said to the jurors.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni of the Southern District of New York threw out of the extortion counts against Percoco, finding that he was working for Cuomo's re-election campaign at the time of the alleged offense and not for the state government.
A highlight of the trial was the cross-examination of Howe by the defense teams for Percoco and the other three defendants in the case.
Howe was arrested after admitting on the stand that he fraudulently challenged his purchase of a luxury Manhattan hotel room with his credit card company, apparently in violation of his cooperation agreement with the government.
He also admitted during cross-examination that he falsely stated in 2014 while filling out an application for disability insurance that he had no prior felony convictions, when in fact he had previously been convicted of wire fraud.
Howe pleaded guilty to eight felony counts as part of the agreement with the government.
In closing arguments, Milton Williams Jr. of Walden Macht & Haran, who represents Gerardi, focused on Howe's misrepresentations, saying that his client is part of a “long line of people who were played like a fool” by Howe and that he put his cooperation agreement with the government at risk during the trial.
“As long as he delivers on the convictions the government will allow him to do whatever he wants,” Williams said.
Stephen Coffey of O'Connell and Aronowitz, who is appearing for Aiello in the case, said to jurors during his closing arguments that they should feel free to reject Howe's testimony, calling it the “word of a man who insulted you and lied to you repeatedly.”
“Todd Howe is a walking, talking reasonable doubt,” Coffey said.
Closing arguments by defense attorneys continue on Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250