Feds' Case for Bribery Is 'All Talk, No Action,' Percoco Defense Counsel Argues
In closing arguments on Wednesday in the corruption trial for Joseph Percoco, a former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Percoco's attorney made a final effort to impeach the government's star witness in the case while portraying his client's alleged quid pro quo as attempts to help out friends.
February 28, 2018 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
Joseph Percoco, a former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Photo: David Handschuh/NYLJ
In closing arguments on Wednesday in the corruption trial for Joseph Percoco, a former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Percoco's attorney made a final effort to impeach the government's star witness in the case while portraying his client's alleged quid pro quo as attempts to help out friends.
Percoco's attorney, Barry Bohrer of Schulte Roth & Zabel, also used his closing arguments, which lasted most of the day and concluded late in the afternoon, to criticize certain aspects of the prosecution's case against Percoco and his three co-defendants, including its focus on the language used in emails presented as government exhibits.
“The government's case is all talk and no action,” Bohrer said to jurors. “And certainly no official action.”
Percoco is charged with extortion, soliciting and receiving bribes and associated conspiracy counts for taking part in pay-to-play schemes to help private companies obtain government contracts and circumnavigate bureaucracy.
He is accused of taking more than $300,000 bribes from Competitive Power Ventures, an energy company that sought a power purchase agreement for a natural gas-fired plant in Orange County, New York; and taking $35,000 from COR Development, a developer that sought contracts for projects in the Syracuse area as well as Percoco's help dealing with a labor union.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni of the Southern District of New York dropped an extortion under color of official right count from the indictment against Percoco, finding he was working on Cuomo's re-election campaign—not the governor's office—at the time of some of his alleged conduct. Such activity would not qualify as official acts, she reasoned.
The extortion charge related to the alleged scheme involving COR Development. CPV executives are accused of setting up Percoco's wife with a “low-show” job with the company as an education consultant that paid $90,000 annually.
Percoco is standing trial alongside former CPV executive Peter Galbraith Kelly Jr. and former COR executives Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi.
The jury heard closing arguments from attorneys for Kelly, Aiello and Gerardi on Tuesday and on Wednesday morning.
But much of the attention in the six-week trial was cast on the government's star witness, former Whiteman Osterman & Hanna lobbyist Todd Howe, a longtime friend of Percoco's who allegedly worked to connect Percoco with companies seeking to do business with the state.
The relationship between Howe and Percoco went back some 30 years, when Howe hired Percoco to work on the campaign of Gov. Mario Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo's father.
Howe entered into a cooperation agreement with the government in September 2016 in which he pleaded guilty to eight counts.
Earlier this month, Howe was arrested after admitting on the stand that he had fraudulently attempted to dispute the purchase of a luxury Manhattan hotel room with his credit card and after admitting that he falsely stated on an application for disability insurance that he did not have a past felony conviction.
Throughout the trial, the prosecution has relied heavily on emails between Percoco, Howe, Percoco's co-defendants and other officials to prove their case to the jury.
In closing arguments on Tuesday, Assistant District Attorney David Zhou also focused in on the occasionally coarse language used in the emails, particularly the frequent use of the word “ziti,” a reference to a term used in an episode of “The Sorpranos” as a reference to money used in a poker game.
“'Where the hell is the ziti, Herb?'” Zhou said during his closing arguments, reading from one of the emails presented as an exhibit in the case.
During his closing arguments, Bohrer addressed Zhou's reference to the line.
“Here's a better question: where the hell is the proof?” Bohrer said. He said that Percoco is a “guy who takes care of his friends” and helped to arrange for meetings between executives and officials, which he said should not fall under the description of an official act.
The government is expected to begin its summation on Thursday. In addition to Zhou, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Janis Echenberg, Robert Boone and Matthew Podolsky are prosecuting the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Issue of First Impression’: New York Judge Clears Coinbase Appeal Amid Crypto Regulatory Clash
4 minute readMeet the Long Island Judge Tapped to Be US Attorney for Eastern District of New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250