NY Federal Jury Awards $13.4 Million in Sexual Harassment Case Against Domino Sugar
According to the suit, the plaintiff, Rosanna Mayo-Coleman, was a storeroom attendant at the Yonkers refinery with more than 20 years' experience when, she alleged, she came under the supervision of a new male manager in 2008.
March 06, 2018 at 06:25 PM
4 minute read
A federal jury has awarded $13.4 million to a woman who suffered sexual harassment at a sugar refinery plant in Yonkers—an amount that her lawyer claims is unusually large and sends a “loud and clear” message in the #MeToo era.
“For a single plaintiff sex-harassment case, there are not a lot of awards in this range,” said Nathaniel Charny of Charny & Wheeler, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff during a weeklong trial last week in Manhattan that resulted in a verdict and award against American Sugar Holding Inc., the parent company of Domino Sugar.
The company, for its part, disputed the claims. And the punitive damages, which account for $11.7 million of the total award, are likely to be reduced by a federal statutory cap on such punitive damages awards.
According to the suit, the plaintiff, Rosanna Mayo-Coleman, was a storeroom attendant at the Yonkers refinery with more than 20 years' experience when, she alleged, she came under the supervision of a new male manager in 2008.
One of only three or four women in a union workforce of some 150 men, she allegedly began getting harassed by the manager repeatedly, eventually sending her into psychiatric counseling and treatment, Charny said.
The manager, Tyrone Smith, for years after 2008 commented regularly on her looks and solicited her romantic attention, the suit claimed. For instance, Charny said in a phone interview on Tuesday, Smith told her she had a “sweet ass” and that he “would tap that” if she weren't “so old.”
He also allegedly spoke to her in such a way in front of others, Charny added, and he would call her into disciplinary meetings alone, close the door and pull her close, and one time grabbed her behind.
Smith, who was in his 30s, also allegedly denied her a chance for work at a better assignment helping welders in the refinery.
Mayo-Coleman, who is now near age 60 and is still working at the refinery, eventually sought psychiatric help and complained repeatedly to management from 2010 onward, including in a letter that said the harassment must stop.
The company in 2012 launched what Charny characterized as an incomplete and cursory internal investigation, sending in an HR representative from another plant who only interviewed some of the witnesses Mayo-Coleman named.
At trial, Charny said he and his trial partner and the lead counsel in the lawsuit, Megan Goddard of Goddard Law in Manhattan, called three employees the HR rep did not interview, right after opening arguments. They all took the stand and corroborated Mayo-Coleman's story and allegations, he said.
American Sugar called an expert who challenged the plaintiff's claims about her injuries, Charny said.
“In my opinion this award is historic,” Charny said. “The current context of #MeToo is empowering juries, and it empowered this jury to send a message of this velocity … Gender-based hostility in the workplace will no longer be tolerated and juries are sending the message loud and clear.”
Charny also noted that Goddard recently won a $1.45 million verdict in a disability discrimination case brought by a female worker.
Goddard said in a statement, “I hope this verdict encourages more women to report sexual harassment, that it encourages companies to protect employees from sexual harassment, and that it inspires women to turn to the court when their employers fail to protect them.”
Kenneth Kelly, a partner at Epstein Becker & Green in Manhattan, represented American Sugar, the lone defendant at trial. He did not return a call seeking comment.
The verdict was for gender–based hostility in the workplace, Charny said. The trial began Feb. 26 and ended March 2 with the verdict and award. Gabrielle Vinci, an associate at Nesenoff & Miltenberg in Manhattan, also helped to represent Mayo-Coleman at trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250