Shell, BP and Sunoco to Pay $196M Over Gasoline Additives in NJ
The payouts mean that New Jersey has now secured settlements of more than $350 million from various defendant companies named in multidistrict litigation over MTBE—methyl tertiary butyl ether—contamination that is playing out in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
March 12, 2018 at 05:40 PM
3 minute read
Bayway refinery. Photo: Carmen Natale/ALM
Three major petroleum conglomerates—Shell, BP and Sunoco—have agreed to pay New Jersey a total of $196.5 million to settle claims that they damaged the state's environment and natural resources by producing gasoline laced with the additive MTBE.
According to an announcement on Monday by New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, the payouts by the oil and chemical companies mean that New Jersey has now secured settlements of more than $350 million from various defendant companies named in multidistrict litigation over MTBE—methyl tertiary butyl ether—contamination.
“These are important legal settlements on behalf of New Jersey citizens—not only in terms of the dollars, but in terms of sending a message that we are committed to working with DEP [the state Department of Environmental Protection] to protect our state's natural resources and hold accountable companies that pollute,” Grewal said in a statement.
The state has been pursuing the litigation for more than a decade, claiming that waterways throughout New Jersey have been contaminated by gasoline containing MTBE that was supplied to the market by the Bayway Refinery in Linden, New Jersey.
The DEP first filed suit in state court in 2007 against ConocoPhillips Co., which was then the owner of the Bayway Refinery, and nearly 50 other companies, under state environmental laws.
The case was later consolidated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where a related case against Chevron was dismissed in 2014.
U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick of the Southern District of New York is presiding over the litigation. The defendants include major petroleum refiners, distributors and sellers of gasoline in New Jersey, as well as independent chemical manufacturers of MTBE, according to Grewal's office.
In May 2017, the Attorney General's Office announced that it had reached a $39 million consent agreement with Phillips 66 Co. in the MTBE litigation.
The state continues to pursue its MTBE damage claims against the remaining named defendants in the litigation who haven't settled, the office noted.
The state pointed out Monday that those defendants include ExxonMobil.
Representatives for Shell, BP and Sunoco could not be immediately reached for comment on Monday.
According to Grewal, Sunoco—including Sunoco Inc. and Sunoco Inc. (R&M)—has already paid the state $64 million to resolve its liability for MTBE damages. Meanwhile, BP—including BP America Inc., BP Amoco Chemical Co., BP Corporation North America Inc., BP Products North America Inc. and Atlantic Richfield Co.—has agreed in a separate settlement to pay $64 million, and has already paid the state $32 million. And Shell—including Equilon Enterprises, Motiva Enterprises, Shell Oil Co., Shell Oil Products Co. and Shell Trading (US) Co.—has agreed to pay $68.5 million.
The state was represented by, among other attorneys, outside counsel Leonard Kaufmann, a partner at Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf in Saddle Brook, New Jersey. He declined to comment Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Medicaid Whistleblowers Awarded $37M Plus Interest
- 2Pfizer Faces Multiple Lawsuits Over Recalled Sickle-Cell Medication
- 3Top 10 Law Firm Videos to Produce in 2025
- 4Elizabeth Cooper of Simpson Thacher on Building Teams in a 'Relationship Business'
- 5Why Hogan Lovells and Perkins Coie Reversed, Will Now Pay Out Special Bonuses to Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
