Garaufis Should Have Granted Mobster's Request to Unseal Documents, 2nd Circuit Says
Convicted Bonanno crime family member Anthony Donato sought to have documents from the trial of his former boss, “Vinny Gorgeous” Basciano, to help with his post-conviction legal efforts.
March 13, 2018 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
A convicted mobster should have been provided some level of access to material under seal as part of his ongoing post-conviction relief efforts, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found Tuesday.
The panel of Circuit Judges José Cabranes and Reena Raggi, with District Judge Lawrence Vilardo of the Western District of New York sitting by designation, issued a summary order reversing the denial of Anthony Donato's motion to unseal documents previously released to co-defendant Vincent “Vinny Gorgeous” Basciano, a Bonanno crime family boss. Basciano was convicted in two separate racketeering and murder trials in the Eastern District of New York, for which he's serving life in prison.
Donato pleaded guilty in 2008 to being part of a murder conspiracy in 2001 in which Donato, Basciano and another co-defendant gunned down Frank Santoro from Donato's car as Santoro walked his dog near his Bronx home.
Donato, who did not appeal his conviction, filed a habeas challenge in 2009, but his petition was denied by U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis, who oversaw his original conviction. Part of Donato's argument was that the government withheld an exculpatory letter written by a cooperating witness during his trial.
That letter, according to court documents, supposedly would have supported Donato's defense that another cooperating witness, former Bonanno captain Dominick Cicale, fabricated Donato's involvement in the murder.
At issue before the appellate panel was an attempt by Donato to have Garaufis unseal material related to what is described in court documents as a bogus jailhouse murder plot involving a Colombian drug-dealing hit man and Cicale. That plan, concocted by Cicale, reportedly was to have the Colombian falsely claim Basciano had sought a Bureau of Prison's officer's help to get the hit man to kill Cicale.
The details of the plot were presented during Basciano's 2011 trial as a way to undermine Cicale's testimony against his former boss. Yet the details of the plot, though shared with Basciano's legal team and widely reported in the press, remained under seal, despite Donato's attempts otherwise.
On Tuesday, the appellate panel said Garaufis had correctly determined that the documents at issue were judicial documents rather than discovery material, which would have meant a greater burden for Donato.
However, the panel said the district court abused its discretion in keeping them under seal. While it acknowledged there were “higher values” issues, like the law enforcement and cooperating witness issues cited by Garaufis that could overcome the presumptive First Amendment right-to-access concerns, those concerns in the current case were applied “too broad for wholesale sealing,” the panel found.
The panel's own review found they were “largely cumulative of the information discussed” in Garaufis' order and “would require minimal redaction if unsealed,” despite the district court's claims otherwise. Information about witnesses in the witness protection program should understandably not be disclosed, the panel noted.
Donato is proceeding pro se in the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250