'Trial-by-Combat' Lawyer, Co-Defendants Reject 'Mob' Label in Fraud Case
A Staten Island lawyer is set to go to trial in May on charges that he and two accomplices ran a violent scrap metal fraud ring that once involved shaking down a co-conspirator in the scheme for $10,000 while at gunpoint in the lawyer's office.
March 15, 2018 at 04:16 PM
2 minute read
A Staten Island lawyer is set to go to trial in May on charges that he and two accomplices ran a violent scrap metal fraud ring that once involved shaking down a co-conspirator at gunpoint for $10,000 in the lawyer's office.
But Richard Luthmann, a flamboyant Staten Island attorney who made headlines a few years ago when he challenged another lawyer to “trial by combat,” and his two co-defendants argued on Wednesday before a federal judge that they shouldn't be stuck with the label of “organized crime.”
The defendants appeared before U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York to argue for severance of the alleged counts in the case, as the judge expressed concern about holding a trial with the “Mafia lurking in the background.”
“Once we mention organized crime and 'Mafia' and gun-running, there's so much prejudice cranked into this case it's questionable that anybody's going to get a fair trial,” Weinstein said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Moira Penza, who appeared for the government, argued that the defendants are mob “associates,” but could not name a supposed crime family to which they were loyal.
Weinstein said they cannot be tied to an “amorphous concept of Mafia.”
Luthmann and co-defendant George Padula III, who federal prosecutors alleged to have hatched the scrap metal fraud ring with an unnamed co-conspirator, are charged with wire fraud, two counts of aggravated identity theft, money laundering, money laundering conspiracy and access-device fraud.
Luthmann, Padula and the third defendant, Michael Beck, who allegedly shook down the co-conspirator at Luthmann's office for money allegedly owed to Luthmann for legal services, are all charged with kidnapping, kidnapping conspiracy, extortion and brandishing a firearm.
The defendants have sought—and the government has opposed—splitting the counts into two trials: one for the alleged scrap-metal fraud, for which Luthmann and Padula face charges, and another for the kidnapping and gun counts, for which all three are charged.
Luthmann is represented by Arthur Aidala, a name partner at Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins. Beck is represented by Manhattan solo attorney James Branden.
Padula is represented by Manhattan attorney Gerald McMahon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250