Criminal, Civil Caseload Decreases at NY Court of Appeals
The number of civil and criminal cases the state's Court of Appeals considered in 2017 fell nearly 37 percent from 2016, according a report issued by the state's Unified Court System.
March 16, 2018 at 05:03 PM
3 minute read
ALBANY — The number of civil and criminal cases the state's Court of Appeals considered in 2017 declined nearly 37 percent from 2016, according to a report issued by the state's Unified Court System.
The annual report, released Thursday afternoon, shohjws that the state's highest court decided on 142 appeals in 2017, a decrease from 225 in 2016, according to a New York Law Journal analysis.
The Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, affirmed 76 cases, reversed 47 cases, modified nine and dismissed another two cases this past year, according to the report. An additional eight cases described as “other,” which include anomalies that didn't result in affirmance, reversal, modifications or dismissals, also were listed.
The sharpest decrease occurred in the number of criminal caseload the Court of Appeals had in 2017. In 2017, the Court of Appeals heard 62 cases, compared to 107 in 2016, a decrease of 42 percent, according to a review of the court's 2016 and 2017 annual reports.
Albany Law School professor Vincent Bonventre, a longtime state court observer, previously told the New York Law Journal that the long-term trajectory of the Court of Appeals is moving in favor of criminal defendants, which is one of the reasons there's been a decrease in criminal cases. But more importantly, the current Court of Appeals is a young court, he said. All of the judges have been appointed by the current governor, Andrew Cuomo, and its longest-serving member, Associate Judge Jenny Rivera, has served for just under five years.
The number of civil cases decided in the Appeals Court also fell in 2017 from the previous year. In 2017, the court reported 80 dispositions of appeals in civil cases, down from 118 in 2016, a decline of 32 percent.
While there were decreases in number of appeals decided, the number of applications stayed flat. In 2016 and 2017, the state Court of Appeals received the exact same 2,497 applications, according to the court system.
An analysis by the New York Law Journal in January found that in 2017, the Court of Appeals granted the fewest number of criminal appeals in a decade-and-a-half. The decrease in the number of criminal appeals by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore is a departure from the tenure of her predecessor Jonathan Lippman.
In a statement to the New York Law Journal in January, DiFiore said she's made no changes in the Court of Appeals since she assumed the role of chief judge in 2016.
“The Court of Appeals has long been committed to giving careful and fair consideration to all motions and applications for leave to appeal and to ensuring that it grants leave to appeal in meritorious cases. That was true in the past and it remains so now. The court's policies and approach have not changed,” DiFiore said.
Additionally, in 2017, the Court of Appeals heard 116 oral arguments; decided on 1,232 motions and reviewed one judicial conduct determination.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYou’re Sure You’ve Looked? The Use of Jackson Affidavits and Efforts to Locate Discovery Materials
Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
- 2Is Your Law Firm Growing Fast Enough? Scale, Consolidation and Competition
- 3Child Custody: The Dangers of 'Rules of Thumb'
- 4The Spectacle of Rudy Giuliani Returns to the SDNY
- 5Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250