Criminal, Civil Caseload Decreases at NY Court of Appeals
The number of civil and criminal cases the state's Court of Appeals considered in 2017 fell nearly 37 percent from 2016, according a report issued by the state's Unified Court System.
March 16, 2018 at 05:03 PM
3 minute read
Court of Appeals Building. Photo Credit: Rick Kopstein/ALM
ALBANY — The number of civil and criminal cases the state's Court of Appeals considered in 2017 declined nearly 37 percent from 2016, according to a report issued by the state's Unified Court System.
The annual report, released Thursday afternoon, shohjws that the state's highest court decided on 142 appeals in 2017, a decrease from 225 in 2016, according to a New York Law Journal analysis.
The Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, affirmed 76 cases, reversed 47 cases, modified nine and dismissed another two cases this past year, according to the report. An additional eight cases described as “other,” which include anomalies that didn't result in affirmance, reversal, modifications or dismissals, also were listed.
The sharpest decrease occurred in the number of criminal caseload the Court of Appeals had in 2017. In 2017, the Court of Appeals heard 62 cases, compared to 107 in 2016, a decrease of 42 percent, according to a review of the court's 2016 and 2017 annual reports.
Albany Law School professor Vincent Bonventre, a longtime state court observer, previously told the New York Law Journal that the long-term trajectory of the Court of Appeals is moving in favor of criminal defendants, which is one of the reasons there's been a decrease in criminal cases. But more importantly, the current Court of Appeals is a young court, he said. All of the judges have been appointed by the current governor, Andrew Cuomo, and its longest-serving member, Associate Judge Jenny Rivera, has served for just under five years.
The number of civil cases decided in the Appeals Court also fell in 2017 from the previous year. In 2017, the court reported 80 dispositions of appeals in civil cases, down from 118 in 2016, a decline of 32 percent.
While there were decreases in number of appeals decided, the number of applications stayed flat. In 2016 and 2017, the state Court of Appeals received the exact same 2,497 applications, according to the court system.
An analysis by the New York Law Journal in January found that in 2017, the Court of Appeals granted the fewest number of criminal appeals in a decade-and-a-half. The decrease in the number of criminal appeals by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore is a departure from the tenure of her predecessor Jonathan Lippman.
In a statement to the New York Law Journal in January, DiFiore said she's made no changes in the Court of Appeals since she assumed the role of chief judge in 2016.
“The Court of Appeals has long been committed to giving careful and fair consideration to all motions and applications for leave to appeal and to ensuring that it grants leave to appeal in meritorious cases. That was true in the past and it remains so now. The court's policies and approach have not changed,” DiFiore said.
Additionally, in 2017, the Court of Appeals heard 116 oral arguments; decided on 1,232 motions and reviewed one judicial conduct determination.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250