Boies Tops Weinstein Company's Big Law Billing Graveyard
Harvey Weinstein's former film studio, which filed for Chapter 11 protection shortly before midnight Monday, owes nearly $20 million to a half-dozen law firms.
March 20, 2018 at 09:25 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein's namesake film studio filed for bankruptcy shortly before midnight Monday, a few weeks after a $500 million deal to sell itself fell through amid questions about undisclosed additional debts.
The Chapter 11 filing in Delaware by The Weinstein Co. Holdings LLC states that the company has both assets and liabilities of between $500 million and $1 billion. The New York-based debtor, which has turned to Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Delaware's Richards, Layton & Finger to represent it in bankruptcy court, owes nearly $20 million to a half-dozen other law firms.
The Weinstein Co. has also entered into a stalking horse agreement with Lantern Capital Partners LP for the Dallas-based private equity firm and turnaround specialist to acquire all of its assets. The Weinstein Co.'s board of directors said in a statement that its proposed bankruptcy sale is “an important step toward justice for any victims who have been silenced by Harvey Weinstein.”
As part of that effort, The Weinstein Co. also announced that it would void all of its non-disclosure agreements as part of its negotiations with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, whose office filed suit in late February against the company and its two founders, brothers Harvey and Robert Weinstein. Sexual harassment and assault allegations levied against Harvey Weinstein late last year sparked the nationwide #MeToo movement, which has since expanded beyond Hollywood into a variety of other industries, including Big Law.
Several large firms appear on a list of The Weinstein Co.'s 30 largest unsecured creditors. Boies Schiller Flexner, a firm whose work on behalf of Harvey Weinstein has come under intense scrutiny for tactics allegedly used against both his alleged victims and journalists looking into Weinstein's purported misconduct, is listed twice on the listing of largest unsecured creditors.
Boies Schiller is cited as being owed nearly $5.7 million as a “film participant vendor,” a possible reference to its Boies/Schiller Film Group unit, which has done business with The Weinstein Co., as well as nearly $4.5 million for “professional services” rendered to the debtor. A spokesman for Boies Schiller, which was accused in court papers in December of helping cover up widespread sexual misconduct at The Weinstein Co., did not return a request for comment on the matter.
O'Melveny & Myers, a firm known for its entertainment industry prowess and reportedly retained by The Weinstein Co. last November when it first began mulling a potential bankruptcy filing, is owed another $3.2 million. The Weinstein Co. also owes $1.82 million to Los Angeles-based Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger, where name partner and high-profile Hollywood litigator Bertram Fields dropped the company as a client in December as a result of unpaid legal bills.
Debevoise & Plimpton, where litigation co-chair John Kiernan led a team of lawyers retained by The Weinstein Co. last fall to conduct an internal investigation into the allegations against Harvey Weinstein, is owed nearly $1.44 million. Seyfarth Shaw, a firm where leading labor and employment partner Gerald Maatman Jr. was hired by The Weinstein Co. earlier this year to help ward off sexual harassment suits, is owed another $1.11 million.
Barnes & Thornburg is the last unsecured creditor on The Weinstein Co.'s top 30 list. The firm, whose contact is civil litigation and compliance of counsel Leasa Woods Anderson in Washington, D.C., is owed $858,994.84. The Weinstein Co. also notes another $2 million as being owed to a client trust maintained by Lavely & Singer, a well-regarded entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles whose name partner Martin Singer is known for advising prominent individuals in Hollywood.
Cravath, a firm that former Harvey Weinstein counsel David Boies left in 1997 to start Boies Schiller, has previously represented The Weinstein Co. in litigation over box office releases and a dispute with its namesake. Paul Zumbro, head of Cravath's financial restructuring and reorganization practice, is working with corporate department managing partner George Zobitz and litigation department managing partner Karin DeMasi in advising The Weinstein Co. in bankruptcy court.
Mark Collins, chair of the bankruptcy and corporate restructuring department at Richards Layton in Wilmington, Delaware, is serving as local bankruptcy co-counsel to The Weinstein Co., along with partner Paul Heath and counsel Zachary Shapiro. Neither Richards Layton nor Cravath have yet filed billing statements detailing their work on behalf of the debtor.
Jason Weltman, director of business and legal affairs with The Weinstein Co. in New York, did not return a request for comment about how the company came to choose Cravath and Richards Layton to handle its Chapter 11 case or whether it would be able to fully compensate other unpaid advisers, unsecured creditors and alleged victims.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Pepper Hamilton have entered appearances in The Weinstein Co.'s Chapter 11 case on behalf of Lantern, which is offering $310 million in cash for the bankrupt company's assets, according to Deadline.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 2Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 3Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 4People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 5How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250