You're Mentally Ill, Case Dismissed, Now Go to Jail
Not until a lawyer witnesses their mentally ill client placed in handcuffs and escorted to jail does the injustice of this law manifest itself.
March 20, 2018 at 11:08 AM
5 minute read
Not until a lawyer witnesses their mentally ill client placed in handcuffs and escorted to jail does the injustice of this law manifest itself. Once they leave the court room, the curtain of the justice system is rolled back. As a criminal defense attorney, you rarely get the opportunity, nor have the time, to know what happens behind the curtain. I made the discovery of those in legal limbo working with the mentally ill behind the stage in my capacity as a supervising psychologist in a jail.
In Gov. Andrew Cuomo's 2018 State of the State, I was heartened when he proposed reform of New York's criminal justice system. True reform cannot be addressed without consideration of the impact of mental illness on the justice system. By 1996, New York state had closed most of the psychiatric hospitals.
As a result, the jails became the new home for the mentally ill. This problem is not unique to New York. According to a 2014 study conducted by Treatment Advocacy Center, there are 10 times more mentally people in jail than in state psychiatric hospitals. The study further highlighted that in 2012, the number of inmates with severe mental illnesses in U.S. jails and prisons was estimated to be 356,268, with that figure climbing.
Pursuant to CPL Article 730, a defendant, who because of mental disease or defect lacks the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his own defense, cannot be prosecuted for a criminal offense. Thereafter, according to CPL 730.20, the evaluation to determine capacity—competency—is conducted by two mental health professionals, one of whom must be a psychiatrist, and the other, a licensed psychologist. This statute is based on the common law statute of 1828, which provided that “no insane person can be tried, sentenced to any punishment, or punished for any crime or offense while he continues in that state.”
Somewhere along the away, we have deviated from the spirit of the law. In New York, petty offenses (e.g., misdemeanors), are dismissed if an individual is found to be mentally incapacitated. He is then sent to the local jail for an unspecified period, despite the dismissal of the criminal case. Here, they remain in legal purgatory awaiting their fate.
The incarceration of the uncharged would appall our Founding Fathers. The Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process (e.g., trial). If a person similarly situated had the same charges dismissed but was found to be competent, he would leave the courthouse a free man. The difference in treatment violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that no state shall deny any person “the equal protection of the laws.” It also violates the Americans with Disability Act because the law discriminates against the mentally ill.
Pursuant to CPL Article 730.40, the mentally ill remain incarcerated until they can be placed in a state facility to determine any risk of danger to themselves or others. If incompetency is based on a developmental disability, such as an intellectual disability, the Office for People with Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD) is required to find placement. If they are found incompetent due to a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, the Office of Mental Health (OMH) becomes the designated responsible agency. While the mentally ill person sits in jail for an indeterminate period, the community mental health services that they were receiving on the outside, such as housing, case management and psychiatric care, are lost. Without these services, the person's likelihood of reoffending increases once they are released. This poses a threat to the community as the person's mental health continues to deteriorate. The data support these concerns. For example, in Los Angeles County Jail, 90 percent of repeat offenders are mentally ill, with 31 percent of those being incarcerated 10 or more times. Additionally, while waiting for their placement, the mentally ill are at risk of being abused. Many are beaten, raped or otherwise victimized. Self-harm and even suicide may result.
My observations motivated me to suggest a solution to this problem. Once a person is deemed legally incapacitated, a representative from the local state facility should be available to escort the individual, on an outpatient basis, to determine what services they require. To ensure this protection, Mental Hygiene Legal Services should be assigned to represent them, once they are deemed incapacitated.
I am encouraged that Governor Cuomo intends to fix our criminal justice system. My hope is that the Governor is able to pull back the curtain and make reforms where the treatment of the mentally incompetent will take center stage.
Robert Goldman, J.D., Psy.D., is an attorney and licensed psychologist. He is also a former Supervising Psychologist for Suffolk County Mental Hygiene Services, where he worked as a supervising psychologist at the Riverhead and Correctional Facilities, as well as the County Clinics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Public Is Best Served by an Ethics Commission That Is Not Dominated by the People It Oversees
4 minute readThe Crisis of Incarcerated Transgender People: A Call to Action for the Judiciary, Prosecutors, and Defense Counsel
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rudy Giuliani's Story Arc in the Southern District of New York
- 2Don’t Blow It: 10 Lessons From 10 Years of Nonprofit Whistleblower Policies
- 3AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 4Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250