BofA Merrill Lynch to Pay $42M Penalty Over Hidden Trade Arrangement, NY AG Says
The investment bank's agreement represents the fourth penalty driven by investigations by the attorney general's office into electronic and high-frequency trading.
March 23, 2018 at 01:35 PM
3 minute read
Bank of America Merrill Lynch agreed to a $42 million penalty with New York State to settle allegations of fraudulent electronic services practices conducted by the bank's investment arm, the office of state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced Friday.
According to the attorney general's office, BofAML entered into undisclosed agreements with so-called electronic liquidity providers over a five-year period, beginning in 2008, without the bank properly alerting investors to the practices. These providers included Citadel Securities, Knight Capital, D.E. Shaw, Two Sigma Securities, and Madoff Securities, according to Schneiderman's office.
Investors were led to believe that BofAML's electronic trading services were safer and more sophisticated than they really were, the attorney general said.
“Bank of America Merrill Lynch went to astonishing lengths to defraud its own institutional clients about who was seeing and filling their orders, who was trading in its dark pool, and the capabilities of its electronic trading services,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “As Wall Street firms offer increasingly complex electronic trading services, they cannot use new technology to exploit their clients in service of their business relationships with large industry players, like Bank of America Merrill Lynch did here.”
The attorney general's office said BofAML admitted it concealed from clients that millions of their equity securities orders were being routed to the electronic liquidity providers. Rather, clients were led to believe the investment bank was handling them in-house. BofAML went so far as to doctor clients' trade confirmation messages—or “masking,” as the bank's employees referred to it—as well as other reports for clients to help cover up the nature of the transactions.
Masking was applied to over 16 million client orders between 2008 and 2013, representing over 4 billion traded shares, Schneiderman's office said.
The office also said it found BofAML had inflated the amount of retail orders routed to and executed in its “Instinct X” dark pool, by as much as six times the actual volume, as well as overstated the robustness of its “Venue Analysis” trading product.
The announcement is just the latest in the office's ongoing efforts by the attorney general's investor protection bureau, armed with the state's powerful Martin Act. The office said as a result of its investigations regarding electronic trading at major Wall Street financial institutions in recent years, BofAML and three other firms, including Barclays and Credit Suisse, have now agreed to pay $125.5 million in penalties to the state for their wrongful conduct.
“I urge all members of the financial community to evaluate and if necessary reform your practices around electronic trading services, to ensure that you treat each and every client, big and small, ethically and loyally. For those financial institutions that refuse to do so, we will hold you accountable,” Schneiderman said.
A spokesman for BofAML did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Testing The Limits of “I Agree”: Court of Appeals Examines Clickwrap Arbitration Agreements
13 minute readAntitrust Yearly Recap: Aggressive Changes by the Biden Administration Precede President Trump’s Return
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250