New Asbestos Rules, Including Punitives, Survive Challenge From Defense Bar
New rules for the New York City asbestos litigation court, including one opening the door for plaintiffs to seek punitive damages, have survived a challenge in state appellate court.
March 26, 2018 at 05:01 PM
2 minute read
New rules for the New York City asbestos litigation court, including one opening the door for plaintiffs to seek punitive damages, have survived a challenge in state appellate court.
A panel of the Appellate Division, First Department found that Justice Peter Moulton, who served as coordinating justice for the asbestos court until last June when he was elevated to the First Department, had the authority to issue the new case management order without the defense bar's consent.
The panel that heard the asbestos defense bar's challenge was composed of Justices Dianne Renwick, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Marcy Kahn, Cynthia Kern and Anil Singh.
Punitive damages have been inaccessible to asbestos plaintiffs since 1996, when a state judge in Manhattan indefinitely deferred all punitive claims.
But in 2014, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Sherry Klein Heitler lifted the blockade and found that punitive claims could be sought.
The First Department affirmed Heitler's decision, but stayed the punitive damages rule until the asbestos court could issue a new case management order.
In crafting the new case management order, which also includes a cap on the number of cases that can be consolidated, Moulton consulted with a group of attorneys from both the plaintiff and defense bars.
The defense bar remained steadfast in its resistance to the reinstatement of punitive damages and challenged the new case management order after it was promulgated.
The plaintiffs attorney who took part in the talks included Jerry Kristal and Charles Ferguson of Weitz & Luxenberg; Jordan Fox of Belluck & Fox; and Robert Komitor, a partner at Levy Konigsberg. Brian Early of The Early Law Firm served as an alternate.
The defense bar was represented by Kristen Fournier of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Judith Yavitz of Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau; Robert Malaby, founding partner of Malaby & Bradley; and Peter Dinunzio, senior counsel to Clyde & Co. David Keyko of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, who appeared for the defense bar for its court challenge, did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Testing The Limits of “I Agree”: Court of Appeals Examines Clickwrap Arbitration Agreements
13 minute readAntitrust Yearly Recap: Aggressive Changes by the Biden Administration Precede President Trump’s Return
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250