NY Attorney General to Lead Multi-State Suit Over Citizenship Question on Census
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced Tuesday that he will "lead a multi-state lawsuit" over the citizenship question added to the 2020 census, a day after California sued the Trump administration over the issue.
March 27, 2018 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced Tuesday that he will “lead a multi-state lawsuit” over the citizenship question added to the 2020 census, a day after California sued the Trump administration over the issue.
“A fair and accurate count of all people in America is one of the federal government's most solemn constitutional obligations,” Schneiderman said. “The Trump Administration's reckless decision to suddenly abandon nearly 70 years of practice by demanding to know the citizenship status of each resident counted cuts to the heart of this sacred obligation—and will create an environment of fear and distrust in immigrant communities that would make impossible both an accurate Census and the fair distribution of federal tax dollars.”
Schneiderman and more than a dozen other attorneys general wrote to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in February to oppose the inclusion of the question.
The California lawsuit, filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, alleges that the inclusion of a question about citizenship on the census violates the Constitution. The suit claims asking about citizenship will “repress responses” from citizens and noncitizens, impeding the Census Bureau from carrying out its constitutional mandate requiring all persons in each state be counted every 10 years.
The lawsuit alleges California will lose billions of dollars in federal funding, as well as the state's “fair share” of congressional seats and Electoral College electors, if the number of people in California is undercounted. In addition to a constitutional violation, the lawsuit alleges the decision to add the question was “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedures Act.
“Since the first day of his presidential campaign and through his first year in office, President Trump has targeted immigrants: vilifying them and attempting to exclude them from the country,” Becerra wrote in an op-ed Monday, along with California Secretary of State Alex Padilla. “Immigrants and their loved ones understandably are, and will be, concerned about how data collected in the 2020 Census will be used.”
The defendants in the case include Ross, the Census Bureau and acting Director Ron Jarmin.
DOJ requested the inclusion of the question late last year. A DOJ spokeswoman said in an email that the department “looks forward to defending the reinstatement of the citizenship question, which will allow the Department to protect the right to vote and ensure free and fair elections for all Americans.”
A Commerce Department spokesman said the agency will not comment on the specifics of pending litigation, but that the case is “without merit.”
The lawsuit requests a declaratory judgment that including the citizenship question violates the Constitution, as well as a preliminary injunction blocking the government from including the question or taking any “irreversible steps” to do so.
A citizenship question has not appeared on the census since 1950. The Commerce Department echoed DOJ's claims that including the question will permit more effective enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, and said that Ross “determined that obtaining complete and accurate information to meet this legitimate government purpose outweighed the limited potential adverse impacts.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute read'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 20
- 2Saxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
- 3Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 4South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 5'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250