CenterLight Healthcare Agrees to $10M Settlement Over Medicaid Billing Fraud
The company allegedly got paid for long-term care services it had contracted out for nearly 200 enrollees, even as some of the patients never received any of the services.
March 28, 2018 at 04:16 PM
3 minute read
A New York health care provider under investigation for improper Medicaid payments for long-term care services that were never provided has agreed to a $10 million settlement, state and federal prosecutors announced Wednesday.
CenterLight Healthcare admitted as part of its agreement with the offices of Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman that on top of getting paid for services that it did't provide, it also failed to unenroll the residents in its managed long-term care plan for which it was paid by Medicaid.
“CenterLight Healthcare collected millions of dollars in Medicaid payments to provide long-term care services to adult home residents in its managed care plan, but frequently failed to deliver these services,” Berman said in a statement. “This Office is committed to holding recipients of government health care funds accountable when they fail to provide the care and services the government pays them to provide.”
Between 2012 and 2015, CenterLight provided long-term care for Medicaid beneficiaries through a contract with the state's Department of Health. To be eligible, patients are required to need community-based long-term care services for more than 120 days from when they enroll in a plan. These services include home-based nursing services and therapies, home health aide services, and adult day care.
CenterLight's role was in providing these services. In exchange, it received monthly payments between approximately $3,600 and $3,800 per member. The company then contracted licensed service providers to provide the needed care to hundreds of adult home residents enrolled in its plan. The investigation found, according to government authorities, that CenterLight was not properly overseeing that the services were actually being provided to its clients. For the 186 members at issue in the settlement, some never received any care they were signed up for during the months they were enrolled in CenterLight's managed care plan, according to investigators.
“When a care provider submits phony bills to Medicaid, they rip off New Yorkers and undermine the integrity of our Medicaid system,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “Today's settlement should serve as another reminder that we will hold accountable those who seek to game the system for their own benefit.”
Wednesday's settlement has its roots in a qui tam whistleblower claim brought against CenterLight in February 2013. There, the company ultimately settled over claims of improper enrollment and service provided to members of its long-term care plan. The government intervened in that suit, and entered into a separate $46.7 million settlement in January 2016 over the claims. The company sold its long-term care plan in early 2017.
Ropes & Gray partner Stephen Warnke represented CenterLight in the matter. He could not be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCaught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute readGift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250