Rapper DMX Receives 1-Year Prison Sentence for Tax Evasion
DMX, 47, was convicted of not paying $1.7 million in taxes between 2002 and 2005.
March 28, 2018 at 07:06 PM
4 minute read
DMX, the rapper also known as Earl Simmons, leaves Manhattan federal court in August 2017 after an appearance in his tax fraud case. Photo: AP/Larry Neumeister.
Playing the music video for one of his own hit songs for a federal judge at a sentencing Wednesday did not spare rapper Earl Simmons, better known as DMX, from receiving a one-year prison term for tax evasion.
But Simmons' defense team said playing the video for DMX's 1998 song “Slippin',” in which the rapper describes his struggles early in life and his desire to improve himself, may have been a factor in swaying U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York from taking the government's recommendation of up to five years in prison.
“I think the judge saw visually just the type of life he lived,” said defense attorney Murray Richman, who told reporters that he was not pleased but “not totally dissatisfied” with the sentence.
Simmons, 47, was convicted of not paying $1.7 million in taxes between 2002 and 2005.
Simmons pleaded not guilty after he was arrested and indicted in July and, at the time, Richman said his client had relied on hired hands to take care of his tax obligations while he focused on his work in music and film.
Simmons later changed his tune and, on Nov. 30, pleaded guilty to one count of tax evasion. Simmons' bail was revoked in January for violating the terms, and he has been incarcerated since.
Simmons appeared in the courtroom in a blue jail uniform and occasionally turned to family sitting in the courtroom. While he addressed the court, Simmons took responsibility for not paying his taxes, saying he did not willingly plot to cheat the government “like a criminal in a comic book,” and briefly choked back tears when he mentioned his youngest child, who was in the courtroom.
“I hired people and I didn't follow up, and I knew that I should have,” Simmons said.
In a statement issued after the sentence, interim Southern District U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said Simmons “stole from the American taxpayers when he earned millions of dollars but failed to pay any taxes on his income.”
“Today's sentence shows that star power does not entitle people to a free pass,” Berman said.
In a sentencing memo filed last week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Cooper urged Rakoff to use Simmons' sentencing to “send a message” that “star power does not entitle someone to a free pass,” noting Simmons earned a substantial income after the subject period and that his songs still get played.
“The defendant's crime was a brazen one,” prosecutors said in the memo. “He earned millions of dollars in recent years, including personally receiving stacks of cash at the end of musical performances.”
Additionally, Simmons' criminal history is both long and varied, prosecutors argued, containing 29 different offenses spanning three decades, including jumping turn styles and firearm charges.
But Simmons' defense team, which also included Stacey Richman and Renee Hill of Richman Hill & Associates, emphasized in court filings and at the sentencing the challenges that their client faced during his upbringing. Simmons grew up with an abusive mother and without a father in the household. He was first arrested when he was 15 years old.
Probation and Pretrial Services recommended that Simmons receive a three-year sentence while his defense team pushed for no jail time.
In imposing the sentence, Rakoff agreed with the government that Simmons' case was a “brazen and blatant” example of tax evasion, but said he also considered Simmons' hardscrabble background in his calculation, saying that the “sins of the parents are visited on the child.”
“Mr. Simmons is a good man but a far from perfect man,” Rakoff said. “In many ways, as he has said, he's his own worst enemy.”
In addition to the prison term, Simmons was sentenced to three years of supervised release. Rakoff imposed no fines for Simmons, but imposed $2.2 million in restitution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250