Prominent Foreclosure Firm Charged With Defrauding Fannie Mae
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office alleged Wednesday that Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates knowingly passed along inflated bills for work done processing foreclosures.
March 29, 2018 at 05:51 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
A prominent foreclosure law firm was charged with defrauding Fannie Mae through a scheme to submit falsely inflated bills to the mortgage servicing companies it worked for, knowing the federal housing authority would ultimately be on the hook through reimbursement payments, the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office announced Wednesday.
“As alleged in the complaint, for years [Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates] exploited its relationship with Fannie Mae, a government-sponsored entity, for its own financial gain by knowingly causing Fannie Mae to pay artificially inflated costs for foreclosure-related services,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said in a statement.
The government's complaint against Rosicki and a pair of wholly owned affiliates came as a complaint-in-intervention in a suit already being pursued by a whistleblower against the law firm, Peter Grubea.
The alleged False Claims Act violations by Rosicki began in the aftermath of the housing crisis a decade ago. An embattled Fannie Mae began using servicers to help, among other things, pursue foreclosures. These servicers would retain law firms, such as Rosicki, to go through the legal foreclosure process.
These firms at times hired third parties to handle various pieces of the process. These contractors would submit their bills to the law firms, who would turn around and submit the bills to the servicers, who would then be reimbursed for the cost of handling the foreclosures by Fannie Mae.
Rosicki used the services of Enterprise Process Service Inc., a service-of-process company, and Paramount Land Inc., a title search company, which it owned. These companies would then contract out work to third parties to serve process and perform title searches required to complete mortgage foreclosures on Fannie Mae-owned loans.
According to prosecutors, beginning in 2009 Rosicki used the affiliates as “vehicles for marking up foreclosure expenses as much as possible, while adding as little operating expense as possible, in order to maximize … revenue.”
While Enterprise and Paramount paid the vendors they contracted competitive rates, the bills they would turn around and submit were “exponentially higher” than what the vendors had charged. Senior attorneys, including partners at Rosicki, were aware that revenue margins were from 300 to 750 percent, according to prosecutors.
These fraudulently inflated expenses caused Fannie Mae to pay millions of dollars for falsely inflated foreclosure expenses, the U.S. Attorney's Office stated.
In a statement, a spokesman for Rosicki said the law firm “has been a highly respected leader in the housing mortgage industry and widely admired for its dedication towards improving the broader community.”
“The charges leveled against the firm are based on questionable legal theories, have no merit and will be vigorously challenged in court,” the spokesman said.
The suit has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLisa Zornberg, Former Adams Chief Counsel, Moves to Morvillo Abramowitz
5 minute readPresidential Immunity Doesn't Block Trump's NY Criminal Prosecution, Judge Rules
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 2Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 3'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 4FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 5California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250