Gov. Andrew Cuomo Drops Plan to Have Judges Certify Workday
Chief Judge Janet DiFiore assured the governor that intervention wasn't necessary.
April 03, 2018 at 02:46 PM
2 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Photo: Bloomberg
Gov. Andrew Cuomo no longer wants the state comptroller to audit the judiciary, agreeing instead to have Chief Judge Janet DiFiore deal with any performance issues.
DiFiore assured the governor that intervention wasn't necessary.
“Because of these discussions, we do remain confident that steps will be taken as part of the Excellence Initiative to make sure judges perform a full day's work. Obviously this is an issue we're still very much interested in and we'll be monitoring progress,” Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi said.
When Cuomo unveiled his $168.2 billion budget in his address to the Legislature in January, he included a proposal to increase the judiciary's budget by 2.5 percent if judges would certify that their courtrooms will remain open until 5 p.m. daily in an effort to cut backlogs.
The proposal was unpopular with the judiciary, and Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks said requiring judges to be at work at least eight hours a day is an “unusual proposal” and “unnecessary.”
The New York state Senate and Assembly also didn't support the governor's proposal, saying in March that they would not include such a provision in their budget bills.
“These are professional people, we shouldn't treat them like schoolkids,” state Sen. John Bonacic, an Orange County Republican who chairs the chamber's Judiciary committee, said in an interview with the New York Law Journal. “Their jobs are not easy, and we aren't prepared to demean them in any way from the important work they do.”
Lucian Chalfen, director of public information for the Office of Court Administration, said the judiciary welcomed the governor's decision to allow the judiciary to monitor itself.
“We appreciate the governor's confidence in the chief judge and her Excellence Initiative, which directly addresses the efficiency of court operations and the reduction of case backlogs,” Chalfen said. “Delivering justice in a timely fashion involves the tireless work of both judicial and non-judicial personnel and should someone fall short, they will be held accountable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
3 minute readUS Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readNew York State's 37th Veterans Treatment Court Opens With New Program in Cattaraugus County
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Jason Leckerman of Ballard Spahr on Growing the Department by a Third Via Merger with Lane Powell
- 2Arguing Class Actions: Manifestation Redux
- 3In Free Agent Lateral Era, Big Law Has 'Entire Teams Dedicated to Identifying' Top Talent
- 4Public Notices/Calendars
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250