Report: New Filings in NY Trial Courts See Decline
The number of new cases filed in New York's trial courts is continuing a years-long decline, with one of the most significant reductions seen in the Criminal Courts in New York City, where police and prosecutors have shifted away from heavy-handed approaches to low-level crimes.
April 06, 2018 at 04:21 PM
4 minute read
The number of new cases filed in New York's trial courts is continuing a years-long decline, with one of the most significant reductions seen in the Criminal Courts in New York City, where police and prosecutors have shifted away from heavy-handed approaches to low-level crimes.
According to a report that the Office of Court Administration released last month, the total number of filings in New York's trial courts was more than 3.27 million in 2017, down from about 3.4 million in the previous year.
The figures are part of a protracted downward trend in new filings in New York trial courts across criminal, civil, Family Court parts: In 2008, new filings reached a high-water mark of 4.67 million and that figure has ratcheted downward with each passing year.
The biggest driver in the downward trend was the New York City Criminal Courts, which handles lesser crimes and misdemeanors punishable by up to a year in jail has seen one of the sharpest declines—from more than 900,000 in 2009, to 808,868 in 2013 to 434,045 last year.
“The lion's share of that decline is the reduction in fillings in the New York City Criminal Courts,” said Lawrence Marks, the chief administrative judge for the state's court system.
Marks said the drop is attributable to recent changes in law enforcement practices in New York City.
In 2016, New York City passed a package of criminal justice reforms that included legislation allowing police to issue summonses for some low-level offenses and so-called quality of life offenses, like public urination and drinking in public, thus treating them as civil, rather than criminal, infractions.
But according to data from the New York City Council, the number of criminal summonses issued had been on the decline in the year leading up to the passage of the reform legislation, known collectively as the Criminal Justice Reform Act: there were more than 267,700 summonses issued in 2016, down from 544,678 in 2009.
Additionally, some district attorneys in the city are adopting less forceful approaches to the least-serious crimes, a retreat from the “broken windows” philosophy of law enforcement.
For example, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. announced last year his office would no longer prosecute turnstile jumping—known as “fare evasion” in law enforcement parlance—and minor drug offenses, which he said should keep tens of thousands of cases out of Criminal Courts each year.
On the civil side, the total number of civil cases filed statewide declined over the five-year period included in the annual report, but not nearly as sharply as new criminal filings: there were 1.45 million new civil filings in 2013, which steadily declined to about 1.3 million last year.
The decline in civil filings is mostly thanks to a sharp drop in foreclosure filings, which spiked dramatically in some New York counties following the 2008-09 financial crisis and—in places like Brooklyn and Queens, which have considerable expanses of shoreline—2012's Hurricane Sandy.
“It's the result of the strong economy and the strong housing market,” Marks said. “It took several years but we're certainly seeing that now.”
As for Family Courts, there were about 611,470 cases filed last year, down from almost 695,000 in 2009, but Marks said it is unlikely that downward trend will continue—the state has recently passed legislation to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 16 years old to 18, and new juvenile cases will be diverted to Family Courts.
Marks noted though that the age increase is being implemented gradually: The age of criminal responsibility increases to 17 in October and will increase to 18 in 2019.
Marks said though that Family Courts in New York City have recently seen an uptick in abuse and neglect cases brought by the city's Administration for Children's Services.
Last year, the city reported that ACS handled an average of 9.8 abuse and neglect cases from July to October 2016, up from 8.5 cases in the same period in the previous year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250