Report: New Filings in NY Trial Courts See Decline
The number of new cases filed in New York's trial courts is continuing a years-long decline, with one of the most significant reductions seen in the Criminal Courts in New York City, where police and prosecutors have shifted away from heavy-handed approaches to low-level crimes.
April 06, 2018 at 04:21 PM
4 minute read
Photo Credit: bikeriderlondon/Shutterstock.com
The number of new cases filed in New York's trial courts is continuing a years-long decline, with one of the most significant reductions seen in the Criminal Courts in New York City, where police and prosecutors have shifted away from heavy-handed approaches to low-level crimes.
According to a report that the Office of Court Administration released last month, the total number of filings in New York's trial courts was more than 3.27 million in 2017, down from about 3.4 million in the previous year.
The figures are part of a protracted downward trend in new filings in New York trial courts across criminal, civil, Family Court parts: In 2008, new filings reached a high-water mark of 4.67 million and that figure has ratcheted downward with each passing year.
The biggest driver in the downward trend was the New York City Criminal Courts, which handles lesser crimes and misdemeanors punishable by up to a year in jail has seen one of the sharpest declines—from more than 900,000 in 2009, to 808,868 in 2013 to 434,045 last year.
“The lion's share of that decline is the reduction in fillings in the New York City Criminal Courts,” said Lawrence Marks, the chief administrative judge for the state's court system.
Marks said the drop is attributable to recent changes in law enforcement practices in New York City.
In 2016, New York City passed a package of criminal justice reforms that included legislation allowing police to issue summonses for some low-level offenses and so-called quality of life offenses, like public urination and drinking in public, thus treating them as civil, rather than criminal, infractions.
But according to data from the New York City Council, the number of criminal summonses issued had been on the decline in the year leading up to the passage of the reform legislation, known collectively as the Criminal Justice Reform Act: there were more than 267,700 summonses issued in 2016, down from 544,678 in 2009.
Additionally, some district attorneys in the city are adopting less forceful approaches to the least-serious crimes, a retreat from the “broken windows” philosophy of law enforcement.
For example, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. announced last year his office would no longer prosecute turnstile jumping—known as “fare evasion” in law enforcement parlance—and minor drug offenses, which he said should keep tens of thousands of cases out of Criminal Courts each year.
On the civil side, the total number of civil cases filed statewide declined over the five-year period included in the annual report, but not nearly as sharply as new criminal filings: there were 1.45 million new civil filings in 2013, which steadily declined to about 1.3 million last year.
The decline in civil filings is mostly thanks to a sharp drop in foreclosure filings, which spiked dramatically in some New York counties following the 2008-09 financial crisis and—in places like Brooklyn and Queens, which have considerable expanses of shoreline—2012's Hurricane Sandy.
“It's the result of the strong economy and the strong housing market,” Marks said. “It took several years but we're certainly seeing that now.”
As for Family Courts, there were about 611,470 cases filed last year, down from almost 695,000 in 2009, but Marks said it is unlikely that downward trend will continue—the state has recently passed legislation to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 16 years old to 18, and new juvenile cases will be diverted to Family Courts.
Marks noted though that the age increase is being implemented gradually: The age of criminal responsibility increases to 17 in October and will increase to 18 in 2019.
Marks said though that Family Courts in New York City have recently seen an uptick in abuse and neglect cases brought by the city's Administration for Children's Services.
Last year, the city reported that ACS handled an average of 9.8 abuse and neglect cases from July to October 2016, up from 8.5 cases in the same period in the previous year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250