NYCLU Sues Suffolk Police for Records on Alleged Roundup of Student Gang Members
The civil rights group claims it has been stonewalled by the police department since lodging an extensive Freedom of Information Law request last Aug. 1.
April 10, 2018 at 06:02 PM
4 minute read
The New York Civil Liberties Union has sued to compel the Suffolk County Police Department to answer a freedom-of-information request aimed at fleshing out the department's alleged role in identifying and detaining immigrant students accused of MS-13 gang involvement.
The civil rights group claims it has been stonewalled by the police department since lodging an extensive Freedom of Information Law request last Aug. 1. In a statement issued Tuesday, the NYCLU said it is concerned that cooperation between the police department, the South Country Central School District in the county and federal immigration authorities has led to dozens of children being removed from their families, placed in restrictive detention facilities, and sent into deportation proceedings “based on spurious claims of gang affiliation.”
The FOIL request seeks to unearth details about the police department's role in what the NYCLU portrays as a coordinated but flawed effort among the local and federal government entities to root out the supposed gang members, who often have ties to El Salvador or other Latin American countries. For instance, the request asks for records relating to: (1) the number of minors identified by the police department as gang members while officers have cooperated with the school district, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security, (2) the policies and guidance officers have used in recognizing supposed gang affiliation, (3) policies related to the department's use of gang databases, (4) agreements between the police department and federal immigration agencies, and (5) instructions from the police department to the school district relating to the identification of gang members.
So far, according to the NYCLU's statements and its Article 78 lawsuit lodged on Monday in Suffolk County Supreme Court, the civil rights group has received nothing.
“Eight months after filing our records requests, New Yorkers still have no answers from the Suffolk police about its role in the Trump administration's immigration dragnet,” NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said.
President Donald Trump, in pressing the case to supporters and the nation that the United States' immigration laws are weak and must be strengthened to stop immigrants, particularly violent ones, from entering illegally, has repeatedly referred to the “dangerous” MS-13 gang members he says have flooded Suffolk County's streets.
The Suffolk County police department said it does not comment on pending litigation.
In the lawsuit, the NYCLU says that it first exhausted the administrative appeal route, after getting no documents from the police department in response to its FOIL request, and that therefore a suit was in order.
“As of the filing of the petition, the SCPD has not provided a single document, claimed any exemptions, or responded to the administrative appeal,” the suit states.
In its news release, the group also explained that in the summer of 2017, it began receiving complaints from families that ICE was targeting their children for removal after school officials had, in coordination with the police, disciplined students for gang involvement “based on flimsy evidence and vague criteria.”
At Bellport High School, for instance, the school's vague dress code policy says that clothing determined by police to be gang-related is not allowed, yet neither the police nor the school informs students what items are prohibited, the organization says.
One student was suspended without warning after he wore a shirt with a small Chicago Bulls logo, the NYCLU claims. Another was suspended for displaying an El Salvador flag on his Facebook page, and the NYCLU is aware of at least two students from the high school suspended on such grounds who were later detained by ICE, it said.
In February, the NYCLU filed a class action lawsuit that included claims on behalf of a Long Island teenager, originally from El Salvador and accused of being a gang member, who the organization said had been locked away for more than seven months. The suit said the Trump administration had stopped following laws directed at reunifying detained immigrant children with their families.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top 10 Predictions for the Legal Technology Job Market in 2025
- 2FTC's Info Security Action Against GoDaddy Sends 'Clear Signal' to Web Hosting Industry: Expert
- 3Data Disposition—Conquering the Seemingly Unscalable Mountain
- 4Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 5Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250