Fox May Bring Sex Harassment Claims Against Ex-Exec Who Sued Over Religious Bias
Fox Broadcasting's breach-of-contract counterclaim may proceed against a former executive who has sued the network for religious discrimination, but who Fox says was fired for violating the company's sexual harassment policies.
April 11, 2018 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
Fox Broadcasting's breach-of-contract counterclaim may proceed against a former executive who has sued the network for religious discrimination, but who Fox says was fired for violating the company's sexual harassment policies.
Cliff Pozner, who worked for Fox for 22 years, the last two as the company's executive vice president of pricing, planning and inventory management, was fired in September 2016 after numerous current and former employees came forward with sexual harassment allegations against him, Fox said according to an opinion from a Manhattan Supreme Court judge, and other papers filed in the case.
In April 2017, Pozner began litigation with a suit against Fox alleging both breach of contract and religious discrimination, claiming he was fired because he is Jewish. He claimed he is entitled to more than $9.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
But two months after Pozner filed his suit, Fox fired back with counterclaims of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.
Pozner's ouster came just months after Fox News founder Roger Ailes resigned amid sexual harassment allegations of his own and before the dismissals of other Fox personalities who have been accused of sexual misconduct, including TV hosts Bill O'Reilly and Eric Bolling.
The suit also detailed the allegations against Pozner that the company looked into, including accusations by two female colleagues that Pozner asked them to expose themselves and an accusation that Pozner suggested that a female colleague have sex with a supervisor so that the supervisor would be less demanding of their department.
Ruling on Fox's counterclaims in an order published this week, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla preserved the company's breach-of-contract counterclaim, finding that Pozner had agreed to follow Fox's anti-sexual harassment policies as a condition of his employment contract.
But Scarpulla rejected Fox's breach-of-fiduciary claim, finding that, as an executive and an employee, Pozner had a duty to be loyal to the company, that the loyalty extends to not committing acts that are at odds with the employer's business interests, such as embezzlement and usurping business opportunities.
“Fox has failed to present, and I haven't found any New York case, in which sexual harassment by an executive, without more, forms the basis for a breach of the duty of loyalty claim, resulting in the employer's recovery of the employee's salary for the entire term of such conduct,” the judge said.
Michael Goettig, of counsel to Davis Wright Tremaine, represents Fox. He declined to comment.
Ethan Leonard of the Law Offices of Neal Brickman represents Pozner. He did not respond to a message requesting comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250