Judge Says She'll Issue Injunction Requiring NYCHA Lead Inspections
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead said Tuesday she will grant a preliminary injunction ordering the agency to conduct inspections in thousands of its units.
April 17, 2018 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead. Photo Credit: David Handschuh
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead said Tuesday she will grant a preliminary injunction ordering the agency to conduct inspections in thousands of its units.
Edmead's statement followed a hearing on Tuesday in which she lobbed tough questions at lawyers for the embattled New York City Housing Authority on inspecting its units for lead.
“We're going to take the road not taken,” Edmead said, paraphrasing poet Robert Frost. She ruled from the bench after a roughly two-hour hearing, which she repeatedly asked housing authority lawyers if the agency could be trusted to conduct the inspections.
Edmead said she will issue a written ruling on the preliminary injunction in the coming days and would, at the NYCHA's behest, hold a hearing on Monday to allow the agency to call witnesses.
The preliminary injunction would require the housing authority to inspect all units in which children aged 8 years old or younger reside within 90 days, as well as those that have not been inspected since 2012 or have an open or unresolved complaint pertaining to lead.
Jim Walden of Walden Macht & Haran, who appeared for the plaintiffs in the case, said the requirement would apply to at least 10,000 units, but said he had not yet determined an exact figure.
Walden told assembled press after the hearing that the judge's ruling was a sign to NYCHA officials that “you cannot avoid your legal obligations.”
“The court has power now to force them to do their legal duty,” Walden said.
The plaintiffs in the case are the Citywide Council of Presidents, a coalition of elected leaders for NYCHA residents; and At-Risk Community Services, an advocacy group for public housing residents. Their legal team also includes Walden Macht attorneys Rachel Brook and Jacob Gardener.
In opposing the preliminary injunction, NYCHA argued that, since October, it has completed the nearly 9,000 visual assessments that it was required to complete by city law and that it has contracted with an outside vendor to complete visual assessments in 48,000 units this year.
At the hearing, NYCHA lawyer Seth Kramer argued that the agency has limited resources on hand and that it has focused its efforts on abating lead paint in common areas.
NYCHA attorneys Nancy Harnett, Andrew Lupin and Melissa Renwick also appeared at the hearing. The agency did not immediately respond to a request to comment on Edmead's remarks.
Edmead's professed support for the preliminary injunction is the latest blow to NYCHA regarding its handling of both lead and mold in its residences.
The hearing on lead came the day after U.S. District Judge William Pauley III of the Southern District of New York—who presides over a class action suit against NYCHA regarding mold in its buildings—ruled that he would hold off on holding an approval hearing for an amended consent decree in the mold litigation calling for the special master in the case to appoint an ombudsperson, a mold analyst and a data analyst.
Pauley said the proposed amended decree “smacks of a slapdash effort” to present him with a “temporary truce” that would allow the plaintiffs to claim a win and give NYCHA the appearance of taking action, and questioned the agency's ability to follow through on its promises.
Pauley also presides over a proposed federal class action against NYCHA regarding lead.
In November, the city's Department of Investigation issued a report stating that the housing authority failed to conduct inspections for a four-year period beginning in 2013 and that, after senior officials were made aware that NYCHA was not in compliance with lead laws, it still falsely certified to the federal government that it was keeping up with required inspections.
In February, a Bronx jury handed up a $57 million verdict to a mother whose daughter was poisoned by lead paint present in their NYCHA unit.
This month, Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared a state of emergency for the NYCHA, and Shola Olatoye, the housing authority's chair and CEO, announced she would step down from her post.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250