NFL Sued by 9 Former Security Reps for Age Discrimination
The plaintiffs allege issues arose after the NFL hired Cathy Lanier, the former Washington, D.C., chief of police, as its new security chief in 2016.
April 17, 2018 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
Nine former security representatives recently fired by the National Football League claim they were let go simply because they were more than 60 years old, according to an age discrimination suit filed this week in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
According to the complaint, the nine plaintiffs are all physically and mentally fit former law enforcement officers who had served as with the league from between 11 and 49 years. Five of the plaintiffs are in their 70s, while the other four are in their 60s.
Their responsibilities, according to the complaint, were to provide stadium inspections, prescription drug audits, background checks, and game day security services for each of the 32 NFL teams to which they were assigned. The league also keeps two unassigned representatives who primarily perform investigative services and background checks for the league as a whole.
Issues arose, according to the complaint, after the NFL hired Cathy Lanier in September 2016, the former Washington, D.C., chief of police, as its new security chief. The complaint claims that Lanier had reportedly been “wildly unpopular with the rank and file” of the Metropolitan Police Department.
Upon her arrival, “rumors swirled” that Lanier planned to fire security representatives, “creating an atmosphere of fear and foreboding,” which the complaint alleges was intentional, as “intimidation is Lanier's 'management' style.”
In April 2017, Lanier alerted representatives that the league was soliciting requests for proposals to fill SR positions to help it move “in a different direction,” according to the complaint. All the plaintiffs said they applied; none were interviewed by Lanier. The plaintiffs claim the process was a sham, designed as cover for Lanier's true intentions of firing the representatives because she'd determined they were too old.
While telling the plaintiffs in July 2017 they were being terminated, they claim Lanier stated it had nothing to do with performance. None of those terminated were under 60 years of age. All those that replaced them, the plaintiffs claim, were anywhere from 10 to 25 years younger.
The complaint stated that Lanier's then-director of security, Michael Rahill, bore witness to the alleged age discrimination.
Rahill allegedly entered Lanier's office as she was about to call one of the plaintiffs, James Buckley, who was then security representative for the New York Giants, to fire him. When he asked why Buckley was being terminated, Lanier allegedly told Rahill that he was too old to walk the stadium, despite being loved by all.
“Meanwhile, plaintiff Buckley is an avid gym-goer and weight lifter, he has a second-degree black belt in karate, a brown belt in Tai Kwon Do, and celebrated his 70th birthday by doing shoulder shrugs with 600 pounds,” the complaint contends, adding that he could “run circles around much younger” security representatives. Buckley served with the Paterson, New Jersey, police department for three decades
Rahill is no longer with the NFL. A message seeking comment was left at the private security consulting company with which he is publicly affiliated.
Pryor Cashman partners Lisa Buckley, the daughter of one of the plaintiffs, and Joshua Zuckerberg are handling the litigation.
Reached by phone, Buckley noted that the suit was brought after prior attempts to resolve the dispute with the NFL fell through, and a right to pursue litigation was granted by the federal U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in February.
“This is a very unfortunate case, where the NFL thinks it can just throw people away, purely based on age, and that really is what this is about,” Buckley said.
In a statement, Brian McCarthy, vice president of communications for the league, said the allegations in the suit “have no merit.”
“The challenged decisions were the result of a wide and objective selection process led by Cathy Lanier. Ms. Lanier is a highly-respected NFL executive and former Washington, D.C. Police Chief with demonstrated impeccable integrity and judgment,” McCarthy said. “We will vigorously defend these.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Justices Appear Leery to Letting Holocaust-Related Claims Against Hungary in U.S. Courts
- 2Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
- 3New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 4The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
- 5Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250