Charitable Deduction and Other Indexed Tax Adjustments for 2018
In his Estate Planning and Philanthropy column, Conrad Teitell writes: Not exciting—but important to know: Each year IRS adjusts charitable gift premium rules, tax tables, personal exemptions, standard deductions and other tax provisions. Here are the key charitable figures for 2018 from Rev. Proc. 2017-58, 2017-45 IRB 489 (Nov. 6, 2017) and Rev. Proc. 2018-18, 2018-10 IRB 392 (March 5, 2018).
April 20, 2018 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
Not exciting—but important to know: Each year IRS adjusts charitable gift premium rules, tax tables, personal exemptions, standard deductions and other tax provisions. Here are the key charitable figures for 2018 from Rev. Proc. 2017-58, 2017-45 IRB 489 (Nov. 6, 2017) and Rev. Proc. 2018-18, 2018-10 IRB 392 (March 5, 2018).
Charitable deductions not reduced for insubstantial donor benefits—2018 safe harbors. Donors needn't reduce their charitable deductions when they receive low-cost articles or items of “insubstantial value” under Rev. Proc. 90-12, 1990-1 CB 471 and successor rulings. Reg. §1.170A-13(f)(8).
For 2018, a charity can tell a donor that his or her gift is fully deductible if:
• The donor receives benefits having a fair market value of $108 or 2 percent of the payment, whichever is less, or
• The donor gives the charity at least $54.00 and receives a low-cost or token item (e.g., a bookmark, mug or T-shirt). The item must bear the charity's name or logo and cost the distributing charity—or the charity on whose behalf the item is distributed—no more than $10.80.
An exception. One sentence long buried in Rev. Proc. 90-12, 1990-1 CB 471, bears highlighting: “These guidelines describe a safe harbor; depending on the facts in each case, benefits received in connection with contributions may be 'insubstantial' even if they do not meet these guidelines.”
Comment. Thus a donor who gives $1 million and receives an item worth $200 might still be able to deduct the entire payment—even though IRS's safe-harbor test isn't met.
What if token items were themselves donated, and thus cost the charity nothing? In that case, says IRS, the charity must make a reasonable estimate of what the items would have cost, had they been purchased.
Safe harbor for unsolicited freebies. Donors needn't reduce their deductions when they receive unsolicited free, low-cost articles as part of a charity's fundraising efforts. Rev. Proc. 92-49, 1992-1 CB 987; Reg. §1.170A-13(8)(f)(i).
How can an item be both “free” and “low-cost”? It has to be free to the donor, and low-cost to the distributing charity—or the charity on whose behalf the item is distributed. For 2018, the low-cost article has to cost the charity—or the charity on whose behalf the item is distributed—no more than $10.80.
A donor needs a receipt in hand from a charity to claim a charitable deduction of $250 or more. If it's an item of insubstantial value (as just described) the item may be ignored for substantiation purposes. Reg. §1.170A-13(f)(8)(i)(A). Thus the receipt could read: “No goods or services were given in exchange for your gift.” Presumably, the receipt could say “we gave you token benefits but they can be disregarded when claiming your charitable deduction.”
Optional standard mileage rates. The mileage rate for a volunteer's use of an automobile for charity in 2018 is 14 cents per mile. Volunteers may also deduct parking fees and tolls—but they should keep accurate odometer readings. The standard charitable mileage rate is not indexed for inflation. It is fixed by the Code and Congress hasn't raised it for some time. Instead of using the standard rate, volunteers can deduct their actual allowable expenses for gas and oil (tolls and parking too) provided proper records have been kept (e.g., credit card receipts, canceled checks, travel diary). However, insurance and depreciation on the car aren't deductible.
Limit on itemized deductions for high income taxpayers repealed for 2018 through 2025. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 repealed the “Pease” provision placing a limit on the charitable and a number of other itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers.
Conrad Teitell is a principal at Cummings & Lockwood in Stamford, Conn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250